Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Dec;18(6):811-823.
doi: 10.1007/s40258-019-00550-y.

Payment Arrangements for Private Healthcare Purchasing Under Publicly Funded Systems in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: Issues and Implications

Affiliations

Payment Arrangements for Private Healthcare Purchasing Under Publicly Funded Systems in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: Issues and Implications

Ayako Honda et al. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2020 Dec.

Erratum in

Abstract

This paper examines private healthcare purchasing under publicly financed health systems in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) to argue that the payment methods and rates applied to private and public health providers need careful attention to ensure equity, efficiency and quality in healthcare service provision. Specifically, public purchasers should develop a clear mechanism to establish justifiable payment rates for the purchase of private health services under publicly funded systems, using cost information and appropriate engagement with private health providers. In order to determine the validity of payment arrangements with private providers, clarification of the shared roles and responsibilities of public and private healthcare providers is required, including specification of types of services to be delivered by public and private providers, and the services for which public providers receive government budget and salaries above payments for other publicly funded services. In addition, carefully designed payment methods should include incentives to encourage healthcare providers to deliver efficient, equitable and quality health services, which requires consideration of how the healthcare purchasing market is structured. Furthermore, governments should establish sound legal frameworks to ensure that public purchasers establish 'strategic' payment arrangements with healthcare providers and that healthcare providers are able to respond to the incentives sent by the payment arrangements. To deepen understanding of public purchasing of private healthcare services and gain further insight in the LMIC context, in-depth empirical studies are necessary on the payment methods and rates used by public purchasers in a range of settings and the implications of payment arrangements on efficiency, equity and quality in healthcare service provision.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Ayako Honda and Amarech Obse have no conflicts of interest to declare in connection with this article.

References

    1. Busse R, Figueras J, Robinson R, Jakubowski E. Strategic purchasing to improve health system performance: key issues and international trends. Healthc Pap. 2007;8:62–76. doi: 10.12927/hcpap.2007.19221. - DOI - PubMed
    1. McPake B, Hanson K. Managing the public-private mix to achieve universal health coverage. Lancet. 2016;388(10044):622–630. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00344-5. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hanson K, Gilson L, Goodman C, Mills A, Smith R, Feachem R, et al. Is private health care the answer to the health problems of the world’s poor? PLoS Medicine. 2008;5(11):e233. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0050233. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Propper C, Green K. A larger role for the private sector in health care? A review of the arguments. In: CMPO Working Paper No. 99009. Centre for Market and Public Organization, University of Bristol; 1999.
    1. Cashin C, Bloom D, Sparkes S, Barroy H, Kutzin J, O’Dougherty S. Aligning public financial management and health financing: sustaining progress toward universal health coverage In: Health Financing Working Paper No 4. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2017.