Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2020 Oct;72(4):1219-1229.
doi: 10.1002/hep.31121. Epub 2020 Oct 9.

Multicenter Validation of Association Between Decline in MRI-PDFF and Histologic Response in NASH

Collaborators, Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Multicenter Validation of Association Between Decline in MRI-PDFF and Histologic Response in NASH

Rohit Loomba et al. Hepatology. 2020 Oct.

Abstract

Background and aims: Emerging data from a single-center study suggests that a 30% relative reduction in liver fat content as assessed by magnetic resonance imaging-proton density fat fraction (MRI-PDFF) from baseline may be associated with histologic improvement in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). There are limited multicenter data comparing an active drug versus placebo on the association between the quantity of liver fat reduction assessed by MRI-PDFF and histologic response in NASH. This study aims to examine the association between 30% relative reduction in MRI-PDFF and histologic response in obeticholic acid (OCA) versus placebo-treated patients in the FLINT (farnesoid X receptor ligand obeticholic acid in NASH trial).

Approach and results: This is a secondary analysis of the FLINT trial including 78 patients with MRI-PDFF measured before and after treatment along with paired liver histology assessment. Histologic response was defined as a 2-point improvement in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease activity score without worsening of fibrosis. OCA (25 mg orally once daily) was better than placebo in improving MRI-PDFF by an absolute difference of -3.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], -6.5 to -0.2%, P value = 0.04) and relative difference of -17% (95% CI, -34 to 0%, P value = 0.05). The optimal cutoff point for relative decline in MRI-PDFF for histologic response was 30% (using Youden's index). The rate of histologic response in those who achieved less than 30% decline in MRI-PDFF versus those who achieved a 30% or greater decline in MRI-PDFF (MRI-PDFF responders) relative to baseline was 19% versus 50%, respectively. Compared with MRI-PDFF nonresponders, MRI-PDFF responders demonstrated both a statistically and clinically significant higher odds 4.86 (95% CI, 1.4-12.8, P value < 0.009) of histologic response, including significant improvements in both steatosis and ballooning.

Conclusion: OCA was better than placebo in reducing liver fat. This multicenter trial provides data regarding the association between 30% decline in MRI-PDFF relative to baseline and histologic response in NASH.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01265498.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1:
Figure 1:. Histologic response in NASH increases as relative decline in MRI-PDFF increases
The y axis represents the proportion of patients who achieved histologic response and the X-axis denotes relative change (decrease towards the left and increase towards the right) in MRI-PDFF. These data include both the OCA and the placebo group. The dotted vertical line represents the optimal cut-point for MRI-PDFF decline at 30% (p-value < 0.05%)

References

    1. Chalasani N, Younossi Z, Lavine JE, et al. The diagnosis and management of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: Practice guidance from the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases. Hepatology 2018;67:328–357. - PubMed
    1. Dulai PS, Singh S, Patel J, et al. Increased risk of mortality by fibrosis stage in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Hepatology 2017. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Loomba R, Abraham M, Unalp A, et al. Association between diabetes, family history of diabetes, and risk of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis and fibrosis. Hepatology 2012;56:943–51. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Williams CD, Stengel J, Asike MI, et al. Prevalence of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis among a largely middle-aged population utilizing ultrasound and liver biopsy: a prospective study. Gastroenterology 2011;140:124–31. - PubMed
    1. Targher G, Day CP, Bonora E. Risk of cardiovascular disease in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. N Engl J Med 2010;363:1341–50. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data

Grants and funding