Diagnostic equivalency of mobile CTG devices and remote analysis to conventional on-site nonstress test
- PMID: 31965765
- DOI: 10.17219/acem/111812
Diagnostic equivalency of mobile CTG devices and remote analysis to conventional on-site nonstress test
Abstract
Background: Remote pregnancy monitoring is one of the most promising applications of telemedicine; however, the diagnostic value of self-examination using mobile cardiotocography (CTG) devices and remote analysis of the subsequent results has never been properly studied.
Objectives: The study aimed to compare the diagnostic usefulness of CTG self-examination using a mobile device to examination performed by a medical professional using a stationary device; and to evaluate the quality of CTG analysis performed remotely.
Material and methods: Eighty-two pairs of CTG recordings were collected; each pair consisted of a single recording from an examination performed by a midwife using a stationary device, and another recording from an unassisted patient self-examination using a mobile device. Recordings were performed with a maximum time interval of 30 min. Each recording was analyzed twice. Primary analysis included a comparison of the assisted examination evaluated on-site vs the self-examination evaluated remotely in pairs. Secondary analysis was conducted by an independent expert who evaluated the unpaired recordings. Baseline fetal heart rate (BFHR) values were compared independently.
Results: We found that patients were more likely to perform inconclusive recordings than experienced midwives; however, the self-examination feasibility was satisfactory. The primary analysis showed 88.4% agreement of the recorded pairs; 11.6% of inconsistent pairs were due to inter-observer variability or medical reasons. The independent expert's analysis showed 97.1% agreement between the assisted and unassisted examinations. Paired t-test for BFHR values showed a statistically significant but clinically negligible mean difference between the 2 devices at 1.75 bpm.
Conclusions: The CTG examinations performed using mobile devices present satisfactory feasibility and equivalent diagnostic value compared to conventional devices, while the remote evaluation of recordings is as reliable as on-site analysis. Remote pregnancy surveillance is safe, effective and may be implemented into everyday obstetric care.
Keywords: eHealth; mobile CTG; remote pregnancy monitoring; teleCTG; telemedicine.
Similar articles
-
Feasibility of a mobile cardiotocogram device for fetal heart rate self-monitoring in low-risk singleton pregnant women.J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2022 Feb;48(2):385-392. doi: 10.1111/jog.15118. Epub 2021 Dec 5. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2022. PMID: 34866285
-
Fetal Heart Rate Monitoring Using Maternal Abdominal Surface Electrodes in Third Trimester: Can We Obtain Additional Information Other than CTG Trace?Adv Clin Exp Med. 2016 Mar-Apr;25(2):309-16. doi: 10.17219/acem/60842. Adv Clin Exp Med. 2016. PMID: 27627565
-
Inter- and intra-observer agreement of non-reassuring cardiotocography analysis and subsequent clinical management.Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2014 Jun;93(6):596-602. doi: 10.1111/aogs.12371. Epub 2014 Apr 15. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2014. PMID: 24597920
-
Continuous cardiotocography during labour: Analysis, classification and management.Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2016 Jan;30:33-47. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2015.03.022. Epub 2015 Jun 25. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2016. PMID: 26165747 Review.
-
Artificial intelligence and machine learning in cardiotocography: A scoping review.Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2023 Feb;281:54-62. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2022.12.008. Epub 2022 Dec 9. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2023. PMID: 36535071
Cited by
-
Computerized cardiotocography analysis during labor - A state-of-the-art review.Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2023 Feb;102(2):130-137. doi: 10.1111/aogs.14498. Epub 2022 Dec 20. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2023. PMID: 36541016 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Application and Clinical Analysis of Remote Fetal Heart Rate Monitoring Platform in Continuous Fetal Heart Rate Monitoring Images.J Healthc Eng. 2021 Mar 20;2021:5517692. doi: 10.1155/2021/5517692. eCollection 2021. J Healthc Eng. 2021. Retraction in: J Healthc Eng. 2023 Oct 11;2023:9826106. doi: 10.1155/2023/9826106. PMID: 33824713 Free PMC article. Retracted.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources