Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Jan;29(1):33-44.
doi: 10.17219/acem/111812.

Diagnostic equivalency of mobile CTG devices and remote analysis to conventional on-site nonstress test

Affiliations
Free article

Diagnostic equivalency of mobile CTG devices and remote analysis to conventional on-site nonstress test

Renata Pilarczyk et al. Adv Clin Exp Med. 2020 Jan.
Free article

Abstract

Background: Remote pregnancy monitoring is one of the most promising applications of telemedicine; however, the diagnostic value of self-examination using mobile cardiotocography (CTG) devices and remote analysis of the subsequent results has never been properly studied.

Objectives: The study aimed to compare the diagnostic usefulness of CTG self-examination using a mobile device to examination performed by a medical professional using a stationary device; and to evaluate the quality of CTG analysis performed remotely.

Material and methods: Eighty-two pairs of CTG recordings were collected; each pair consisted of a single recording from an examination performed by a midwife using a stationary device, and another recording from an unassisted patient self-examination using a mobile device. Recordings were performed with a maximum time interval of 30 min. Each recording was analyzed twice. Primary analysis included a comparison of the assisted examination evaluated on-site vs the self-examination evaluated remotely in pairs. Secondary analysis was conducted by an independent expert who evaluated the unpaired recordings. Baseline fetal heart rate (BFHR) values were compared independently.

Results: We found that patients were more likely to perform inconclusive recordings than experienced midwives; however, the self-examination feasibility was satisfactory. The primary analysis showed 88.4% agreement of the recorded pairs; 11.6% of inconsistent pairs were due to inter-observer variability or medical reasons. The independent expert's analysis showed 97.1% agreement between the assisted and unassisted examinations. Paired t-test for BFHR values showed a statistically significant but clinically negligible mean difference between the 2 devices at 1.75 bpm.

Conclusions: The CTG examinations performed using mobile devices present satisfactory feasibility and equivalent diagnostic value compared to conventional devices, while the remote evaluation of recordings is as reliable as on-site analysis. Remote pregnancy surveillance is safe, effective and may be implemented into everyday obstetric care.

Keywords: eHealth; mobile CTG; remote pregnancy monitoring; teleCTG; telemedicine.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

LinkOut - more resources