Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2019 Dec 15:125 Suppl 24:4602-4608.
doi: 10.1002/cncr.32476.

Do all patients with recurrent ovarian cancer need systemic therapy?

Affiliations
Free article
Review

Do all patients with recurrent ovarian cancer need systemic therapy?

Michael L Friedlander. Cancer. .
Free article

Abstract

The scientific organizing committee of the 12th International Symposium on Advanced Ovarian Cancer: Optimal Therapy. Update proposed the question regarding whether all patients with recurrent ovarian cancer (ROC) need systemic therapy. This article has addressed this question and focused on the clinical scenarios in which the benefits of systemic therapy in patients with ROC are limited, including the frail elderly and patients with multiple medical comorbidities, as well as a subset of patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer who have a particularly poor prognosis with a short survival. The challenges of identifying and selecting which patients are unlikely to benefit from systemic therapy were addressed. The benefit of systemic therapy also can be questioned in specific histological subtypes of ROC such as low-grade serous cancers as well as clear cell and mucinous cancers in view of low response rates. Finally, the contentious question regarding the timing of chemotherapy in asymptomatic patients with CA 125 disease progression after response to first-line chemotherapy was addressed and an argument made challenging the current treatment paradigm. Clearly, not all patients with ROC need or should be offered systemic therapy, and ultimately the recommendations need to be based on evidence and communicated in a clear and sensitive manner to patients and their families.

Keywords: cancer; end of life; ovarian; palliation; recurrent.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Friedlander M, Stockler M, O’Connell R, et al; Symptom Benefit Study Group. Symptom burden and outcomes of patients with platinum resistant/refractory recurrent ovarian cancer: a reality check: results of stage 1 of the Gynecologic Cancer Intergroup Symptom Benefit Study. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2014;24:857-864.
    1. Roncolato FT, Berton-Rigaud D, O’Connell R, et al. Validation of the modified Glasgow Prognostic Score (mGPS) in recurrent ovarian cancer (ROC)-analysis of patients enrolled in the GCIG Symptom Benefit Study (SBS). Gynecol Oncol. 2018;148:36-41.
    1. Schnipper LE, Smith TJ, Raghavan D, et al. American Society of Clinical Oncology identifies five key opportunities to improve care and reduce costs: the top five list for oncology. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30:1715-1724.
    1. Wright AA, Zhang B, Keating NL, Weeks JC, Prigerson HG. Associations between palliative chemotherapy and adult cancer patients' end of life care and place of death: prospective cohort study. BMJ. 2014;348:g1219.
    1. Ledermann JA, Luvero D, Shafer A, et al. Gynecologic Cancer InterGroup (GCIG) consensus review for mucinous ovarian carcinoma. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2014;24(9 suppl 3):S14-S19.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources