Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Apr;23(2):509-518.
doi: 10.1111/hex.13016. Epub 2020 Jan 22.

Communicating cancer risk in the primary care consultation when using a cancer risk assessment tool: Qualitative study with service users and practitioners

Joseph N A Akanuwe  1 , Sharon Black  1 , Sara Owen  2 , Aloysius Niroshan Siriwardena  1
Affiliations

Communicating cancer risk in the primary care consultation when using a cancer risk assessment tool: Qualitative study with service users and practitioners

Joseph N A Akanuwe et al. Health Expect. 2020 Apr.

Abstract

Background: Cancer risk assessment tools are designed to help detect cancer risk in symptomatic individuals presenting to primary care. An early detection of cancer risk could mean early referral for investigations, diagnosis and treatment, helping to address late diagnosis of cancer. It is not clear how best cancer risk may be communicated to patients when using a cancer risk assessment tool to assess their risk of developing cancer.

Objective: We aimed to explore the perspectives of service users and primary care practitioners on communicating cancer risk information to patients, when using QCancer, a cancer risk assessment tool.

Design: A qualitative study involving the use of individual interviews and focus groups.

Setting and participants: Conducted in primary care settings in Lincolnshire with a convenience sample of 36 participants (19 service users who were members of the public) and 17 primary care practitioners (general practitioners and practice nurses).

Results: Participants suggested ways to improve communication of cancer risk information: personalizing risk information; involving patients in use of the tool; sharing risk information openly; and providing sufficient time when using the tool during consultations.

Conclusion: Communication of cancer risk information is complex and difficult. We identified strategies for improving communication with patients involving cancer risk estimations in primary care consultations.

Keywords: QCancer; cancer risk assessment tools; cancer risk communication; general practitioners; primary care; service user views.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

There are no conflicts of interest for Akanuwe, Black, Owen or Siriwardena.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Vignette (example) of QCancer risk scores
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Gandhi TK, Kachalia A, Thomas EJ, et al. Missed and delayed diagnoses in the ambulatory setting: a study of closed malpractice claims. Ann Intern Med. 2006;145:488‐496. - PubMed
    1. Singh H, Kadiyala H, Bhagwath G, et al. Using a multifaceted approach to improve the follow‐up of positive faecal occult blood test results. Am J Gastroenterol. 2009;104:942‐952. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Singh H, Thomas EJ, Khan MM, Petersen LA. Identifying diagnostic errors in primary care using an electronic screening algorithm. Arch Intern Med. 2007;167:302‐308. - PubMed
    1. Hamilton W. The CAPER studies: five case‐control studies aimed at identifying and quantifying the risk of cancer in symptomatic primary care patients. Br J Cancer. 2009;101(Suppl. 2):S80‐S86. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hippisley‐Cox J, Coupland C. Identifying patients with suspected lung cancer in primary care: derivation and validation of an algorithm. Br J Gen Pract. 2011;61(592):e715‐e723. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types