Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2020 Jan 22;15(1):e0227652.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0227652. eCollection 2020.

Early diagnosis of sepsis in emergency departments, time to treatment, and association with mortality: An observational study

Affiliations
Observational Study

Early diagnosis of sepsis in emergency departments, time to treatment, and association with mortality: An observational study

Gunnar Husabø et al. PLoS One. .

Erratum in

Abstract

Background: Early recognition of sepsis is critical for timely initiation of treatment. The first objective of this study was to assess the timeliness of diagnostic procedures for recognizing sepsis in emergency departments. We define diagnostic procedures as tests used to help diagnose the condition of patients. The second objective was to estimate associations between diagnostic procedures and time to antibiotic treatment, and to estimate associations between time to antibiotic treatment and mortality.

Methods: This observational study from 24 emergency departments in Norway included 1559 patients with infection and at least two systemic inflammatory response syndrome criteria. We estimated associations using linear and logistic regression analyses.

Results: Of the study patients, 72.9% (CI 70.7-75.1) had documented triage within 15 minutes of presentation to the emergency departments, 44.9% (42.4-47.4) were examined by a physician in accordance with the triage priority, 44.4% (41.4-46.9) were adequately observed through continual monitoring of signs while in the emergency department, and 25.4% (23.2-27.7) received antibiotics within 1 hour. Delay or non-completion of these key diagnostic procedures predicted a delay of more than 2.5 hours to antibiotic treatment. Patients who received antibiotics within 1 hour had an observed 30-day all-cause mortality of 13.6% (10.1-17.1), in the timespan 2 to 3 hours after admission 5.9% (2.8-9.1), and 4 hours or later after admission 10.5% (5.7-15.3).

Conclusions: Key procedures for recognizing sepsis were delayed or not completed in a substantial proportion of patients admitted to the emergency department with sepsis. Delay or non-completion of key diagnostic procedures was associated with prolonged time to treatment with antibiotics. This suggests a need for systematic improvement in the initial management of patients admitted to emergency departments with sepsis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Distribution of patients according to number of non-completed or delayed key diagnostic procedures.
Key procedures: triage within 15 minutes, examination by physician in accordance with urgency specified during triage, blood lactate measured within 1 hour, adequate observation regimen. N = 1559.
Fig 2
Fig 2. All-cause 30-day mortality by time to antibiotic treatment.
Gray shaded histogram represents mortality rates according to time to antibiotic treatment in hours. Solid black curve with bars represents model-predicted mortality rates with 95% confidence intervals according to time to antibiotic treatment in minutes using logistic regression models, adjusted for patient’s age, date of admission, comorbidity, and presence of organ failure. Date of admission was measured using calendar days since study start, entered as a polynomial function with first (b -0.011 p<0.001), second (b 2.5e-5 p<0.001) and third degree (b -1.2e-8 p<0.01) variables. The model prediction uses average values for adjustment values.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Rhee C, Dantes R, Epstein L, Murphy DJ, Seymour CW, Iwashyna TJ, et al. Incidence and Trends of Sepsis in US Hospitals Using Clinical vs Claims Data, 2009–2014. JAMA. 2017;318(13):1241–9. 10.1001/jama.2017.13836 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Prescott HC, Osterholzer JJ, Langa KM, Angus DC, Iwashyna TJ. Late mortality after sepsis: propensity matched cohort study. BMJ. 2016;353:i2375 10.1136/bmj.i2375 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Reinhart K, Daniels R, Kissoon N, Machado FR, Schachter RD, Finfer S. Recognizing Sepsis as a Global Health Priority—A WHO Resolution. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(5):414–7. 10.1056/NEJMp1707170 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Page DB, Donnelly JP, Wang HE. Community-, Healthcare-, and Hospital-Acquired Severe Sepsis Hospitalizations in the University HealthSystem Consortium. Crit Care Med. 2015;43(9):1945–51. 10.1097/CCM.0000000000001164 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Morr M, Lukasz A, Rübig E, Pavenstädt H, Kümpers P. Sepsis recognition in the emergency department–impact on quality of care and outcome? BMC Emerg Med. 2017;17(1):11 10.1186/s12873-017-0122-9 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances