Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2020 Jan 21;10(1):e029346.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029346.

Tinnitus healthcare: a survey revealing extensive variation in opinion and practices across Europe

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Tinnitus healthcare: a survey revealing extensive variation in opinion and practices across Europe

Rilana F F Cima et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Tinnitus remains a scientific and clinical problem whereby, in spite of increasing knowledge on effective treatment and management for tinnitus, very little impact on clinical practice has been observed. There is evidence that prolonged, obscure and indirect referral trajectories persist in usual tinnitus care.

Objective: It is widely acknowledged that efforts to change professional practice are more successful if barriers are identified and implementation activities are systematically tailored to the specific determinants of practice. The aim of this study was to administer a health service evaluation survey to scope current practice and knowledge of standards in tinnitus care across Europe. The purpose of this survey was to specifically inform the development process of a European clinical guideline that would be implementable in all European countries.

Design: A health service evaluation survey was carried out.

Setting: The survey was carried out online across Europe.

Participants: Clinical experts, researchers and policy-makers involved in national tinnitus healthcare and decision-making.

Outcome measures: A survey was developed by the study steering group, piloted on clinicians from the TINNET network and underwent two iterations before being finalised. The survey was then administered to clinicians and policy-makers from 24 European countries.

Results: Data collected from 625 respondents revealed significant differences in national healthcare structures, use of tinnitus definitions, opinions on characteristics of patients with tinnitus, assessment procedures and particularly in available treatment options. Differences between northern and eastern European countries were most notable.

Conclusions: Most European countries do not have national clinical guidelines for the management of tinnitus. Reflective of this, clinical practices in tinnitus healthcare vary dramatically across countries. This equates to inequities of care for people with tinnitus across Europe and an opportunity to introduce standards in the form of a European clinical guideline. This survey has highlighted important barriers and facilitators to the implementation of such a guideline.

Keywords: barriers; facilitators; guidelines; health-service evaluation; pan-European; standard of care; tinnitus.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Responses from each participating country.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Discipline of respondents. GP, general practitioner.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Most common referrals according to region. ENT, ear, nose and throat.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Main questionnaire used per region. HADS, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale; TFI, Tinnitus Functional Index; THI, Tinnitus Handicap Inventory; TQ, Tinnitus Questionnaire.

References

    1. Martinez C, Wallenhorst C, McFerran D, et al. . Incidence rates of clinically significant tinnitus: 10-year trend from a cohort study in England. Ear Hear 2015;36:e69–75. 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000121 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Baguley D, McFerran D, Hall D. Tinnitus. Lancet 2013;382:1600–7. 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60142-7 - DOI - PubMed
    1. McCormack A, Edmondson-Jones M, Somerset S, et al. . A systematic review of the reporting of tinnitus prevalence and severity. Hear Res 2016;337:70–9. 10.1016/j.heares.2016.05.009 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Nondahl DM, Cruickshanks KJ, Huang G-H, et al. . Generational differences in the reporting of tinnitus. Ear Hear 2012;33:640–4. 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31825069e8 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Elgoyhen AB, Langguth B, De Ridder D, et al. . Tinnitus: perspectives from human neuroimaging. Nat Rev Neurosci 2015;16:632–42. 10.1038/nrn4003 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types