Puzzle of the interfacial blocks: response to Dr Franco and Inozemtsev

Affiliations

¹ Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Istanbul Universitesi-Cerrahpasa, Cerrahpasa Medical School, Istanbul, Turkey eceyamak@gmail.com.
² Anesthesiology Institute, Department of Outcomes Research, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
³ Division of Rheumatology-Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Florence, Firenze, Italy.
⁴ Anestesiología y Reanimación, Hospital Universtario de Móstoles, Móstoles, Spain.
⁵ Anesthesia, Hospital Mexico Costa Rica, San Jose, Costa Rica.
⁶ Anesthesia, Hospital Interzonal General Dr. José Penna, Buenos Aires, Argentina.

Comment

Ece Yamak Altinpulluk et al. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2020 Aug.

. 2020 Aug;45(8):673-674.

doi: 10.1136/rapm-2019-101187. Epub 2020 Jan 21.

¹ Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Istanbul Universitesi-Cerrahpasa, Cerrahpasa Medical School, Istanbul, Turkey eceyamak@gmail.com.
² Anesthesiology Institute, Department of Outcomes Research, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
³ Division of Rheumatology-Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Florence, Firenze, Italy.
⁴ Anestesiología y Reanimación, Hospital Universtario de Móstoles, Móstoles, Spain.
⁵ Anesthesia, Hospital Mexico Costa Rica, San Jose, Costa Rica.
⁶ Anesthesia, Hospital Interzonal General Dr. José Penna, Buenos Aires, Argentina.

No abstract available

Keywords: brachial plexus; regional anesthesia; truncal blocks.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Refining a great idea: the consolidation of PECS I, PECS II and serratus blocks into a single thoracic fascial plane block, the SAP block.
Franco CD, Inozemtsev K. Franco CD, et al. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2019 Sep 26:rapm-2019-100745. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2019-100745. Online ahead of print. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2019. PMID: 31558684