Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Jan 4:2020:9241081.
doi: 10.1155/2020/9241081. eCollection 2020.

Exploring Current Evidence on the Past, the Present, and the Future of the Heart Team: A Narrative Review

Alexandru Burlacu  1   2 , Adrian Covic  2   3   4 , Mircea Cinteza  5   6 , Paula Madalina Lupu  2 , Radu Deac  7 , Grigore Tinica  2   8
Affiliations
Review

Exploring Current Evidence on the Past, the Present, and the Future of the Heart Team: A Narrative Review

Alexandru Burlacu et al. Cardiovasc Ther. .

Abstract

Introduction: Including healthcare professionals dealing with cardiovascular diseases, Heart Team is a concept/structure designed for selecting diagnostic strategies, facilitating therapeutic decisions, and improving cardiovascular outcomes in patients with complex heart pathologies, requiring input from different subspecialties and the necessity of a multidisciplinary approach. The aim of this narrative review is to search for and to summarize current evidence regarding Heart Team and to underline the future directions for the development of this concept.

Methods: We searched the electronic database of PubMed, SCOPUS, and Cochrane CENTRAL for studies including Heart Team. Forty-eight studies were included, if reference was made to Heart Team structure and functionality.

Results: We depicted the structure and the timeline of Heart Team, along with actual evidence-based recommendations from European Guidelines. We underlined the importance of quality of knowledge-sharing and decision-making inside the Team, analyzing bad decisions which did not reflect members' true beliefs due to "uniformity pressure, closed mindedness, and illusion of invulnerability." The observation that Guidelines' indications regarding Heart Team carry a level C indication underlines the very future of this Team: randomized controlled trials proving solid benefits in an evidence-based world.

Conclusions: Envisioned as a tool for optimizing the management of various complex cardiovascular pathologies, Heart Team should simplify and facilitate the activity in the cardiovascular ward. Finally, these facts should be translated into better cardiovascular outcomes and a lower psychological distress among Team participants. Despite all future changes, there must always be a constant part: the patient should remain at the very center of the Team.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

References

    1. Head S. J., Kaul S., Mack M. J., et al. The rationale for heart team decision-making for patients with stable, complex coronary artery disease. European Heart Journal. 2013;34(32):2510–2518. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/eht059. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Windecker S., Kolh P., Alfonso F., et al. 2014 ESC/EACTS guidelines on myocardial revascularization: the task force on myocardial revascularization of the European society of cardiology (ESC) and the European association for cardio-thoracic surgery (EACTS) developed with the special contribution of the European association of percutaneous cardiovascular interventions (EAPCI) European Heart Journal. 2014;35(37):2541–2619. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehu278. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Holmes D. R., Jr., Rich J. B., Zoghbi W. A., Mack M. J. The heart team of cardiovascular care. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2013;61(9):903–907. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.08.1034. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Filardo G., Maggioni A. P., Mura G., et al. The consequences of under-use of coronary revascularization: results of a cohort study in Northern Italy. European Heart Journal. 2001;22(8):654–662. doi: 10.1053/euhj.2000.2282. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Baig S. S., Altman D. G., Taggart D. P. Major geographical variations in elective coronary revascularization by stents or surgery in England. European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. 2014;47(5):855–859. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezu276. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms