Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Jan 13:3:4.
doi: 10.1038/s41746-019-0206-x. eCollection 2020.

What is the clinical value of mHealth for patients?

Affiliations
Review

What is the clinical value of mHealth for patients?

Simon P Rowland et al. NPJ Digit Med. .

Abstract

Despite growing interest from both patients and healthcare providers, there is little clinical guidance on how mobile apps should be utilized to add value to patient care. We categorize apps according to their functionality (e.g. preventative behavior change, digital self-management of a specific condition, diagnostic) and discuss evidence for effectiveness from published systematic reviews and meta-analyses and the relevance to patient care. We discuss the limitations of the current literature describing clinical outcomes from mHealth apps, what FDA clearance means now (510(k)/de novo FDA clearance) and in the future. We discuss data security and privacy as a major concern for patients when using mHealth apps. Patients are often not involved in the development of mobile health guidelines, and professionals' views regarding high-quality health apps may not reflect patients' views. We discuss efforts to develop guidelines for the development of safe and effective mHealth apps in the US and elsewhere and the role of independent app reviews sites in identifying mHealth apps for patient care. There are only a small number of clinical scenarios where published evidence suggests that mHealth apps may improve patient outcomes.

Keywords: Public health; Therapeutics.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interestsThe authors declare no competing interest.

References

    1. Ryu Seewon. Book Review: mHealth: New Horizons for Health through Mobile Technologies: Based on the Findings of the Second Global Survey on eHealth (Global Observatory for eHealth Series, Volume 3) Healthcare Informatics Research. 2012;18(3):231. doi: 10.4258/hir.2012.18.3.231. - DOI
    1. NICE. Evidence Standards Framework for Digital Health Technologies (National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, 2018).
    1. Millenson Michael L., Baldwin Jessica L., Zipperer Lorri, Singh Hardeep. Beyond Dr. Google: the evidence on consumer-facing digital tools for diagnosis. Diagnosis. 2018;5(3):95–105. doi: 10.1515/dx-2018-0009. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Semigran, H. L., Linder, J. A., Gidengil, C. & Mehrotra, A. Evaluation of symptom checkers for self diagnosis and triage: Audit study. BMJ351, h3480 (2015). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Buechi R, et al. Evidence assessing the diagnostic performance of medical smartphone apps: a systematic review and exploratory meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 2017;7:1–8. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018280. - DOI - PMC - PubMed