Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine (SMFM) Consult Series #49: Cesarean scar pregnancy
- PMID: 31972162
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.01.030
Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine (SMFM) Consult Series #49: Cesarean scar pregnancy
Erratum in
-
May 2020 (vol. 222, no. 5, page B2).Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Jan;224(1):106. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.08.036. Epub 2020 Oct 6. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021. PMID: 33036730 No abstract available.
Abstract
Cesarean scar pregnancy is a complication in which an early pregnancy implants in the scar from a prior cesarean delivery. This condition presents a substantial risk for severe maternal morbidity because of challenges in securing a prompt diagnosis, as well as uncertainty regarding optimal treatment once identified. Ultrasound is the primary imaging modality for cesarean scar pregnancy diagnosis, although a correct and timely determination can be difficult. Surgical, medical, and minimally invasive therapies have been described for cesarean scar pregnancy management, but the optimal treatment is not known. Women who decline treatment of a cesarean scar pregnancy should be counseled regarding the risk for severe morbidity. The following are Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine recommendations: We recommend against expectant management of cesarean scar pregnancy (GRADE 1B); we suggest operative resection (with transvaginal or laparoscopic approaches when possible) or ultrasound-guided vacuum aspiration be considered for surgical management of cesarean scar pregnancy and that sharp curettage alone be avoided (GRADE 2C); we suggest intragestational methotrexate for medical treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy, with or without other treatment modalities (GRADE 2C); we recommend that systemic methotrexate alone not be used to treat cesarean scar pregnancy (GRADE 1C); in women who choose expectant management and continuation of a cesarean scar pregnancy, we recommend repeat cesarean delivery between 34 0/7 and 35 6/7 weeks of gestation (GRADE 1C); we recommend that women with a cesarean scar pregnancy be advised of the risks of another pregnancy and counseled regarding effective contraceptive methods, including long-acting reversible contraception and permanent contraception (GRADE 1C).
Keywords: cesarean scar ectopic; cesarean scar pregnancy; placenta accreta spectrum.
Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Inc.
Comment in
-
Reply.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Jan;224(1):135. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.09.030. Epub 2020 Sep 24. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021. PMID: 32980356 No abstract available.
-
Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine Consult Series for cesarean scar pregnancy: each treatment option has its indications.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Jan;224(1):134-135. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.09.029. Epub 2020 Sep 24. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021. PMID: 32980360 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine Consult Series #63: Cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Sep;227(3):B9-B20. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.06.024. Epub 2022 Jul 16. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022. PMID: 35850938
-
Cesarean Scar Pregnancy, Incidence, and Recurrence: Five-Year Experience at a Single Tertiary Care Referral Center.Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Nov;132(5):1285-1295. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002940. Obstet Gynecol. 2018. PMID: 30303911
-
Cesarean scar pregnancy: issues in management.Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Mar;23(3):247-53. doi: 10.1002/uog.974. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2004. PMID: 15027012
-
Unforeseen consequences of the increasing rate of cesarean deliveries: early placenta accreta and cesarean scar pregnancy. A review.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Jul;207(1):14-29. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2012.03.007. Epub 2012 Mar 10. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012. PMID: 22516620 Review.
-
Cesarean scar pregnancy: a practical overview and our series of combined double step procedure management.Minerva Obstet Gynecol. 2024 Oct;76(5):416-422. doi: 10.23736/S2724-606X.23.05291-0. Epub 2023 Jun 16. Minerva Obstet Gynecol. 2024. PMID: 37326353 Review.
Cited by
-
Effectiveness, complications, and reproductive outcomes after cesarean scar pregnancy management: a retrospective cohort study.AJOG Glob Rep. 2022 Dec 6;3(1):100143. doi: 10.1016/j.xagr.2022.100143. eCollection 2023 Feb. AJOG Glob Rep. 2022. PMID: 36691399 Free PMC article.
-
Terminology for describing normally sited and ectopic pregnancies on ultrasound: ESHRE recommendations for good practice.Hum Reprod Open. 2020 Dec 16;2020(4):hoaa055. doi: 10.1093/hropen/hoaa055. eCollection 2020. Hum Reprod Open. 2020. PMID: 33354626 Free PMC article.
-
Predictive nomogram of ultrasound indicators for the termination outcome of caesarean scar pregnancy.Sci Rep. 2024 Dec 28;14(1):31378. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-82894-7. Sci Rep. 2024. PMID: 39733108 Free PMC article.
-
A prediction nomogram for residual after negative pressure aspiration for endogenic cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy: a retrospective study.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2025 Feb 3;25(1):107. doi: 10.1186/s12884-025-07255-2. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2025. PMID: 39901095 Free PMC article.
-
The Efficacy and Health Economics of Different Treatments for Type 1 Cesarean Scar Pregnancy.Front Pharmacol. 2022 Jan 28;13:822319. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.822319. eCollection 2022. Front Pharmacol. 2022. PMID: 35153794 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical