Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Practice Guideline
. 2020 May;222(5):B2-B14.
doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.01.030. Epub 2020 Jan 21.

Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine (SMFM) Consult Series #49: Cesarean scar pregnancy

Affiliations
Practice Guideline

Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine (SMFM) Consult Series #49: Cesarean scar pregnancy

Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine (SMFM). Electronic address: pubs@smfm.org et al. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 May.

Erratum in

  • May 2020 (vol. 222, no. 5, page B2).
    [No authors listed] [No authors listed] Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Jan;224(1):106. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.08.036. Epub 2020 Oct 6. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021. PMID: 33036730 No abstract available.

Abstract

Cesarean scar pregnancy is a complication in which an early pregnancy implants in the scar from a prior cesarean delivery. This condition presents a substantial risk for severe maternal morbidity because of challenges in securing a prompt diagnosis, as well as uncertainty regarding optimal treatment once identified. Ultrasound is the primary imaging modality for cesarean scar pregnancy diagnosis, although a correct and timely determination can be difficult. Surgical, medical, and minimally invasive therapies have been described for cesarean scar pregnancy management, but the optimal treatment is not known. Women who decline treatment of a cesarean scar pregnancy should be counseled regarding the risk for severe morbidity. The following are Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine recommendations: We recommend against expectant management of cesarean scar pregnancy (GRADE 1B); we suggest operative resection (with transvaginal or laparoscopic approaches when possible) or ultrasound-guided vacuum aspiration be considered for surgical management of cesarean scar pregnancy and that sharp curettage alone be avoided (GRADE 2C); we suggest intragestational methotrexate for medical treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy, with or without other treatment modalities (GRADE 2C); we recommend that systemic methotrexate alone not be used to treat cesarean scar pregnancy (GRADE 1C); in women who choose expectant management and continuation of a cesarean scar pregnancy, we recommend repeat cesarean delivery between 34 0/7 and 35 6/7 weeks of gestation (GRADE 1C); we recommend that women with a cesarean scar pregnancy be advised of the risks of another pregnancy and counseled regarding effective contraceptive methods, including long-acting reversible contraception and permanent contraception (GRADE 1C).

Keywords: cesarean scar ectopic; cesarean scar pregnancy; placenta accreta spectrum.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

  • Reply.
    Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine Publications Committee. Electronic address: pubs@smfm.org. Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine Publications Committee. Electronic address: pubs@smfm.org. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Jan;224(1):135. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.09.030. Epub 2020 Sep 24. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021. PMID: 32980356 No abstract available.
  • Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine Consult Series for cesarean scar pregnancy: each treatment option has its indications.
    OuYang Z, Wu J, Zhong B. OuYang Z, et al. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Jan;224(1):134-135. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.09.029. Epub 2020 Sep 24. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021. PMID: 32980360 No abstract available.

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances