Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Mar;30(2):229-233.
doi: 10.1097/MOU.0000000000000733.

An update on systemic therapy for penile cancer

Affiliations
Review

An update on systemic therapy for penile cancer

Irene Resch et al. Curr Opin Urol. 2020 Mar.

Abstract

Purpose of review: Whereas substantial advances have been made in systemic tumour therapy in the past decade, the prognosis of advanced squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the penis remains disproportionally poor. In this review, we aimed to present an update on systemic therapy of penile SCC highlighting the most recent data and future perspectives.

Recent findings: Lymph node metastases play a key role in treating and assessing the prognosis of patients with penile SCC. Data show longer overall survival with the use of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with pelvic lymph node metastases and recent analyses lead to the development of a nomogramm predicting overall survival in connection with the use of perioperative chemotherapy. There are two pathways in the pathogenesis of penile cancer, including human papilloma virus related and unrelated, leading to many possible novel therapeutic targets. Other targeted therapies have been evaluated, which show promising results with the use of tyrosine kinase inhibitors.

Summary: Chemotherapy has shown moderate activity in advanced stages of the disease, however, the ideal timing of chemotherapy in patients with lymph node metastases is not entirely clear. Potential targets for future therapies exist, and are already being tested in other malignancies. Owing to the rarity of this condition, a robust evidence is lacking and it is of great importance to pursue further research to unveil several aspects of this disease, particularly in patients with recurrence, lymph node metastases or metastatic disease.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Hakenberg OW, Drager DL, Erbersdobler A, et al. The diagnosis and treatment of penile cancer. Dtsch Arztebl Int 2018; 115:646–652.
    1. Pham MN, Deal AM, Ferguson JE 3rd, et al. Contemporary survival trends in penile cancer: results from the National Cancer Database. Urol Oncol 2017; 35:674.e1–674.e9.
    1. Hakenberg OW, Comperat EM, Minhas S, et al. EAU guidelines on penile cancer: 2014 update. Eur Urol 2015; 67:142–150.
    1. Ficarra V, Akduman B, Bouchot O, et al. Prognostic factors in penile cancer. Urology 2010; 76: (2 Suppl 1): S66–73.
    1. Pandey D, Mahajan V, Kannan RR. Prognostic factors in node-positive carcinoma of the penis. J Surg Oncol 2006; 93:133–138.

LinkOut - more resources