Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Feb;40(2):312-321.
doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000002383.

OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY ANGIOGRAPHY CHANGES AFTER SUBTHRESHOLD MICROPULSE YELLOW LASER IN DIABETIC MACULAR EDEMA

Affiliations

OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY ANGIOGRAPHY CHANGES AFTER SUBTHRESHOLD MICROPULSE YELLOW LASER IN DIABETIC MACULAR EDEMA

Stela Vujosevic et al. Retina. 2020 Feb.

Abstract

Purpose: To assess changes on optical coherence tomography (OCT) angiography in diabetic macular edema (DME) treated with subthreshold micropulse yellow laser (SMPL) over a period of 6 months.

Methods: Thirty-five eyes (35 consecutive patients) with treatment-naive DME prospectively underwent (at baseline, 3 and 6 months) best-corrected visual acuity, swept-source OCT angiography/OCT, and fundus autofluorescence. Following parameters were evaluated on OCT angiography in the superficial capillary plexus (SCP) and deep capillary plexus (DCP): the area of foveal avascular zone, number of microaneurysms (MA), area of cysts, and presence of capillary network alterations. Microaneurysm change was also evaluated in 15 fellow eyes, not needing treatment over 6 months. Vessel and perfusion densities were evaluated in the SCP, DCP, and choriocapillaris, with image J. Retina thickness, number of hyperreflective retinal spots, and external limiting membrane integrity were evaluated on OCT. All measurements were performed by two masked graders, independently.

Results: All patients had diabetes mellitus Type 2 (mean age, 69.4 ± 10.9 years; duration of diabetes mellitus, 15.7 ± 8.7 years; and HbA1c 7.7 ± 1.2%). Mean best-corrected visual acuity at baseline was 69.7 ± 12.0 letters ETDRS, 72.7 ± 10.7 at 3 months (gain 3.1 ± 4.3, P = 0.0049) and 74.3 ± 9.5 at 6 months (gain 4.6 ± 7.2, P < 0.0001). Foveal avascular zone area decreased in the DCP at 6 months (P = 0.01). Area of cysts decreased in the SCP at 3 months and 6 months (P = 0.038; P = 0.049), and in the DCP at 6 months (P = 0.0071). Number of MA decreased at 6 months in the SCP (P = 0.0007) and at 3 months and 6 months in the DCP (P = 0.048; P < 0.0001) in treated eyes. No significant change in number of MA was found in nontreated eyes. There was no statistically significant change in any other OCT angiography/OCT parameter.

Conclusion: Subthreshold micropulse yellow laser induces more pronounced changes in the DCP than in the SCP in DME. These changes occurred as early as 3 months after treatment. The evaluation of specific parameters in the DCP may help in determining treatment response.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Das A, Mcguire PG, Rangasamy S. Diabetic macular edema: pathophysiology and novel therapeutic targets. Ophthalmology 2015;122:1375–1394.
    1. Laursen ML, Moeller F, Sander B, Sjoelie AK. Subthreshold micropulse diode laser treatment in diabetic macular oedema. Br J Ophthalmol 2004;88:1173–1179.
    1. Figueira J, Khan J, Nunes S, et al. Prospective randomised controlled trial comparing sub-threshold micropulse diode laser photocoagulation and conventional green laser for clinically significant diabetic macular oedema. Br J Ophthalmol 2009;93:1341–1344.
    1. Vujosevic S, Bottega E, Casciano M, et al. Microperimetry and fundus autofluorescence in diabetic macular edema: subthreshold micropulse diode laser versus modified early treatment diabetic retinopathy study laser photocoagulation. Retina 2010;30:908–916.
    1. Lavinsky D, Cardillo JA, Melo LAS, et al. Randomized clinical trial evaluating mETDRS versus normal or high-density micropulse photocoagulation for diabetic macular edema. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2011;52:4314–4323.