What factors affect patients' access to healthcare? Protocol for an overview of systematic reviews
- PMID: 31973757
- PMCID: PMC6979353
- DOI: 10.1186/s13643-020-1278-z
What factors affect patients' access to healthcare? Protocol for an overview of systematic reviews
Abstract
Background: The importance of access to healthcare for all is internationally recognised as a global goal, high on the global agenda. Yet inequalities in health exist within and between countries which are exacerbated by inequalities in access to healthcare. In order to address these inequalities, we need to better understand what drives them. While there exists a wealth of research on access to healthcare in different countries and contexts, and for different patient groups, to date no attempt has been made to bring this evidence together through a global lens. This study aims to address that gap by bringing together evidence of what factors affect patients' access to healthcare and exploring how those factors vary in different countries and contexts around the world.
Methods: An overview of reviews will be conducted using a comprehensive search strategy to search four databases: Medline, Embase, Global Health and Cochrane Systematic Reviews. Additional searches will be conducted on the Gates Foundation, the World Health Organisation (WHO) and World Bank websites. Titles and abstracts will be screened against the eligibility criteria and full-text articles will be obtained for all records that meet the inclusion criteria or where there is uncertainty around eligibility. A data extraction table will be developed during the review process and will be piloted and refined before full data extraction commences. Methodological quality/risk of bias will be assessed for each included study using the AMSTAR 2 tool. The quality assessment will be used to inform the narrative synthesis, but a low-quality score will not necessarily lead to study exclusion.
Discussion: Factors affecting patients' ability to access healthcare will be identified and analysed according to different country and context characteristics to shed light on the importance of different factors in different settings. Results will be interpreted accounting for the usual challenges associated with conducting such reviews. The results may guide future research in this area and contribute to priority setting for development initiatives aimed at ensuring equitable access to healthcare for all.
Systematic review registration: PROSPERO CRD42019144775.
Keywords: Access to healthcare; Inequalities in access to healthcare; Overview; Systematic review of systematic reviews.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
References
-
- United Nations. Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. New York, USA: UN; 2015.
-
- Calvello E, Reynolds T, Hirshon JM, Buckle C, Moresky R, O’Neill J, et al. Emergency care in sub-Saharan Africa: results of a consensus conference. African Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2013;3(1):42–48. doi: 10.1016/j.afjem.2013.01.001. - DOI
-
- Healthcare Access GBD. Healthcare Access and Quality Index based on mortality from causes amenable to personal health care in 195 countries and territories, 1990-2015: a novel analysis from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015. Lancet. 2017;390(10091):231–266. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30818-8. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Ouma PO, Maina J, Thuranira PN, Macharia PM, Alegana VA, English M, et al. Access to emergency hospital care provided by the public sector in sub-Saharan Africa in 2015: a geocoded inventory and spatial analysis. Lancet Glob Health. 2018;6(3):e342–ee50. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(17)30488-6. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
