Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Sep;21(9):1065-1073.
doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2020.01.007. Epub 2020 Jan 15.

Incidence, Prognosis and Predictors of Major Vascular Complications and Percutaneous Closure Device Failure Following Contemporary Percutaneous Transfemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

Affiliations

Incidence, Prognosis and Predictors of Major Vascular Complications and Percutaneous Closure Device Failure Following Contemporary Percutaneous Transfemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

Wayne Batchelor et al. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2020 Sep.

Abstract

Objectives: To determine the incidence, prognosis, and predictors of major Valve Academic Research Consortium (VARC-2) vascular complications (VCs) and percutaneous vascular closure device failure (PCDF) following contemporary percutaneous transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TF-TAVR).

Background: Limited data exists on the incidence and predictors of VCs and PCDFs following percutaneous TF-TAVR using contemporary 14-16 French (F) sheaths.

Methods: We recorded clinical and procedural characteristics, computer tomography (CT) angiographic data, 30-day VCs, mortality, and length of stay (LOS) in all consecutive percutaneous TF-TAVRs at a single center from June 2016 to October 2018. CT measures included common femoral artery (CFA) and external iliac artery (EIA) diameters, sheath to CFA and EIA ratios (SFAR and SEIAR), depth of CFA, extent and location of CFA calcification and pelvic vessel tortuosity (2 bends ≥90°). Multivariable regression was used to predict major VCs and percutaneous closure device failure (PCDF), respectively.

Results: The final sample consisted of 303 percutaneous TF-TAVRs. Median age was 80 years, 51% were male, 86% Caucasian, 33% had diabetes mellitus (DM) and mean STS score was 5.8 ± 3.8%. Baseline characteristics were similar in patients with vs. without VCs, other than coronary artery disease (CAD) (69% vs. 54%, respectively; p = 0.029) and DM (21% vs. 36%, respectively; p = 0.02). There were 65 (21%) vascular complications: 19 major VCs [6.3%], 29 minor [VCs 9.6%] and 17 PCDFs [5.6%]. Overall, 30-day mortality was low (2.6%). Major VCs were associated with higher mortality (42% vs. 0%, p < 0.0001) while minor VCs (3% vs. 0%, mortality p = 0.99) and PCDFs (3% vs. 0% mortality, p = 0.99) were not. PCDFs were associated with a longer median LOS (4 vs. 3 days, p = 0.02). The independent predictors of major VCs were pelvic vessel tortuosity (OR 3.1; 95% CI 1.1-9.2) and presence of CAD (OR 8.2; 95% CI 1.8-37). Female gender showed a strong trend toward increased risk (OR 3.4; CI 0.84-14; p = 0.086). There were no independent predictors of PCDF.

Conclusion: Contemporary percutaneous TF-TAVR is associated with a low risk of mortality, major VCs and PCDFs. Major VCs confer increased mortality and PCDFs prolong LOS. Pelvic vessel tortuosity and a history of CAD predict major VCs; there were no predictors of PCDFs. These results provide a contemporary update on the incidence and implications of these important vascular complications in the current era of percutaneous TF-TAVR using 14-16F vascular sheaths.

Keywords: TAVR; Transcatheter aortic valve replacement; Vascular complications.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Study flowchart.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Computed tomography images of (a) non-contrast axial image of a shallow (28 mm depth) right CFA with anterior calcification, (b) a deep (88 mm) right CFA without calcification, (c) a relatively shallow right CFA with near complete circumferential calcification and (d) a 3-dimensional reconstructed view demonstrating marked tortuosity of the left common iliac artery. The red arrows in the figures indicate the depth (mm) and location of the corresponding CFA.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.
Graph depicting the incidence of VARC-2 vascular complications.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 4.
Graph depicting 30-day mortality according to various forms of VARC-2 vascular complications.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 5.
Receiver operator curves using SEIAR > 0.75, SFAR > 0.75 and the multivariable model as predictors of major VARC-2 vascular complications.

Comment in

References

    1. Leon MB, Smith CR, Mack M, Miller DC, Moses JW, Svensson LG, et al. Transcatheter aortic-valve implantation for aortic stenosis in patients who cannot undergo surgery. N Engl J Med 2010;363:1597–607. 10.1056/NEJMoa1008232. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Smith CR, Leon MB, Mack MJ, Miller DC, Moses JW, Svensson LG, et al. Transcatheter versus surgical aortic-valve replacement in high-risk patients. N Engl J Med 2011; 364:2187–98. 10.1056/NEJMoa1103510. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Carnero-Alcázar M, Maroto LC, Cobiella-Carnicer J, Vilacosta I, Nombela-Franco L, Alswies A, et al. Transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement in moderate and high-risk patients: a meta-analysis. Eur J Cardio-thoracic Surg 2017. 10.1093/ejcts/ezw388. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Généreux P, Head SJ, Van Mieghem NM, Kodali S, Kirtane AJ, Xu K, et al. Clinical outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve replacement using valve academic research consortium definitions: a weighted meta-analysis of 3,519 patients from 16 studies. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012;59:2317–26. 10.1016/J.JACC.2012.02.022. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Thourani VH, Kodali S, Makkar RR, Herrmann V, Williams M, Babaliaros RR, et al. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement versus surgical valve replacement in intermediate-risk patients: a propensity score analysis. Lancet 2016. 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30073-3. - DOI - PubMed