Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Feb 7;15(2):257-264.
doi: 10.2215/CJN.09170819. Epub 2020 Jan 23.

Reproducibility of Deceased Donor Kidney Procurement Biopsies

Affiliations

Reproducibility of Deceased Donor Kidney Procurement Biopsies

S Ali Husain et al. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. .

Abstract

Background and objectives: Unfavorable histology on procurement biopsies is the most common reason for deceased donor kidney discard. We sought to assess the reproducibility of procurement biopsy findings.

Design, setting, participants, & measurements: We compiled a continuous cohort of deceased donor kidneys transplanted at our institution from 1/1/2006 to 12/31/2016 that had at least one procurement biopsy performed, and excluded cases with missing biopsy reports and those used in multiorgan transplants. Suboptimal histology was defined as the presence of advanced sclerosis in greater than or equal to one biopsy compartment (glomeruli, tubules/interstitium, vessels). We calculated κ coefficients to assess agreement in optimal versus suboptimal classification between sequential biopsy reports for kidneys that underwent multiple procurement biopsies and used time-to-event analysis to evaluate the association between first versus second biopsies and patient and allograft survival.

Results: Of the 1011 kidneys included in our cohort, 606 (60%) had multiple procurement biopsies; 98% had first biopsy performed at another organ procurement organization and their second biopsy performed locally. Categorical agreement was highest for vascular disease (κ=0.17) followed by interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy (κ=0.12) and glomerulosclerosis (κ=0.12). Overall histologic agreement (optimal versus suboptimal) was κ=0.15. First biopsy histology had no association with allograft survival in unadjusted or adjusted analyses. However, second biopsy optimal histology was associated with a higher probability of death-censored allograft survival, even after adjusting for donor and recipient factors (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.50; 95% confidence interval, 0.34 to 0.75; P=0.001).

Conclusions: Deceased donor kidneys that underwent multiple procurement biopsies often displayed substantial differences in histologic categorization in sequential biopsies, and there was no association between first biopsy findings and post-transplant outcomes.

Keywords: allografts; atrophy; biopsy; cohort studies; confidence intervals; deceased donor kidney; humans; kidney; kidney biopsy; kidney transplantation; probability; procurement; reproducibility of results; sclerosis; tissue and organ procurement; tissue donors; transplant pathology; vascular diseases.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

None
Graphical abstract
Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Flow diagram of study cohort. CUMC, Columbia University Medical Center; OPO, organ procurement organization.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Concordance between histologic findings on first and second procurement biopsies. Agreement between first and second biopsies was poor overall, with strongest agreement for vascular disease (κ=0.17, concordance 59%), followed by interstitial fibrosis/tubular atrophy (κ=0.12, concordance 71%), and glomerulosclerosis (κ=0.12, concordance 44%).
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Unadjusted Kaplan–Meier curves of death-censored allograft survival on the basis of first procurement biopsy histology (log rank P=0.72) and second procurement biopsy histology (log rank P=0.002) showing that only second biopsy histology was associated with death-censored allograft survival.

References

    1. Stewart DE, Garcia VC, Rosendale JD, Klassen DK, Carrico BJ: Diagnosing the decades-long rise in the deceased donor kidney discard rate in the United States. Transplantation 101: 575–587, 2017. - PubMed
    1. Mohan S, Foley K, Chiles MC, Dube GK, Patzer RE, Pastan SO, Crew RJ, Cohen DJ, Ratner LE: The weekend effect alters the procurement and discard rates of deceased donor kidneys in the United States. Kidney Int 90: 157–163, 2016. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mohan S, Chiles MC, Patzer RE, Pastan SO, Husain SA, Carpenter DJ, Dube GK, Crew RJ, Ratner LE, Cohen DJ: Factors leading to the discard of deceased donor kidneys in the United States. Kidney Int 94: 187–198, 2018. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Oniscu GC, Brown H, Forsythe JL: Impact of cadaveric renal transplantation on survival in patients listed for transplantation. J Am Soc Nephrol 16: 1859–1865, 2005. - PubMed
    1. Wolfe RA, Ashby VB, Milford EL, Ojo AO, Ettenger RE, Agodoa LY, Held PJ, Port FK: Comparison of mortality in all patients on dialysis, patients on dialysis awaiting transplantation, and recipients of a first cadaveric transplant. N Engl J Med 341: 1725–1730, 1999. - PubMed

Publication types