Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Nov 7;40(1):17-38.
doi: 10.1007/s40614-016-0080-7. eCollection 2017 Jun.

Coal Is Not Black, Snow Is Not White, Food Is Not a Reinforcer: The Roles of Affordances and Dispositions in the Analysis of Behavior

Affiliations

Coal Is Not Black, Snow Is Not White, Food Is Not a Reinforcer: The Roles of Affordances and Dispositions in the Analysis of Behavior

Peter R Killeen et al. Behav Anal. .

Abstract

Reinforcers comprise sequences of actions in context. Just as the white of snow and black of coal depend on the interaction of an organism's visual system and the reflectances in its surrounds, reinforcers depend on an organism's motivational state and the affordances-possibilities for perception and action-in its surrounds. Reinforcers are not intrinsic to things but are a relation between what the thing affords, its context, the organism, and his or her history as capitulated in their current state. Reinforcers and other affordances are potentialities rather than intrinsic features. Realizing those potentialities requires motivational operations and stimulus contexts that change the state of the organism-they change its disposition to make the desired response. An expansion of the three-term contingency is suggested in order to help keep us mindful of the importance of behavioral systems, states, emotions, and dispositions in our research programs.

Keywords: Affordance; Affordee; Dispositions; Emotion; Four-term contingency; Law of effect; Linear algebra; Motivation; Notation; States.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of InterestThe authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

    1. Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 1991;50(2):179–211. doi: 10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T. - DOI
    1. Augustson EM, Dougher MJ. The transfer of avoidance evoking functions through stimulus equivalence classes. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry. 1997;28(3):181–191. doi: 10.1016/S0005-7916(97)00008-6. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Balsam PD, Deich JD, Ohyama T, Stokes PD. Origins of new behavior. In: O’Donohue WT, editor. Learning and behavior therapy. Needham Heights: Allyn and Bacon; 1998. pp. 403–420.
    1. Balsam PD, Silver R. Behavioral change as a result of experience: toward principles of learning and development. In: Hogan JA, Bolhuis JJ, editors. Causal mechanisms of behavioural development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1994. pp. 327–357.
    1. Barrett L. Beyond the brain: how body and environment shape animal and human minds. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 2011.

LinkOut - more resources