Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Mar 26;135(13):996-1007.
doi: 10.1182/blood.2019002395.

Avadomide monotherapy in relapsed/refractory DLBCL: safety, efficacy, and a predictive gene classifier

Affiliations

Avadomide monotherapy in relapsed/refractory DLBCL: safety, efficacy, and a predictive gene classifier

Cecilia Carpio et al. Blood. .

Erratum in

Abstract

Treatment options for relapsed/refractory (R/R) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) are limited, with no standard of care; prognosis is poor, with 4- to 6-month median survival. Avadomide (CC-122) is a cereblon-modulating agent with immunomodulatory and direct antitumor activities. This phase 1 dose-expansion study assessed safety and clinical activity of avadomide monotherapy in patients with de novo R/R DLBCL and transformed lymphoma. Additionally, a novel gene expression classifier, which identifies tumors with a high immune cell infiltration, was shown to enrich for response to avadomide in R/R DLBCL. Ninety-seven patients with R/R DLBCL, including 12 patients with transformed lymphoma, received 3 to 5 mg avadomide administered on continuous or intermittent schedules until unacceptable toxicity, disease progression, or withdrawal. Eighty-two patients (85%) experienced ≥1 grade 3/4 treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs), most commonly neutropenia (51%), infections (24%), anemia (12%), and febrile neutropenia (10%). Discontinuations because of AEs occurred in 10% of patients. Introduction of an intermittent 5/7-day schedule improved tolerability and reduced frequency and severity of neutropenia, febrile neutropenia, and infections. Among 84 patients with de novo R/R DLBCL, overall response rate (ORR) was 29%, including 11% complete response (CR). Responses were cell-of-origin independent. Classifier-positive DLBCL patients (de novo) had an ORR of 44%, median progression-free survival (mPFS) of 6 months, and 16% CR vs an ORR of 19%, mPFS of 1.5 months, and 5% CR in classifier-negative patients (P = .0096). Avadomide is being evaluated in combination with other antilymphoma agents. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT01421524.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict-of-interest disclosure: C.C. received travel grants from Takeda, Janssen, Roche, and Celgene, A Bristol-Myers Squibb Company. L.Y. reports research funding from Janssen and Roche, and served on the advisory board for Abbvie, Gilead, Roche, and Janssen. J.-M.S. received travel grants from Roche and honoraria from Roche, Gilead, Janssen, Celgene, A Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Kern-Pharma and Servier and served on the advisory board of Roche, Gilead, Janssen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Kern-Pharma, and Celltrion. G.S. received research funding from Roche and Celgene, A Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, and served on the advisory board for Novartis. R.C. participated in a speaker’s bureau for Roche, Janssen, and Celgene, A Bristol-Myers Squibb Company; received honoraria from Roche, Janssen, and Celgene, A Bristol-Myers Squibb Company; served on the advisory board for Janssen, Celgene, A Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, and Servier; and received travel grants from Roche, Janssen, Celgene, A Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, AbbVie, and Pfizer. A.P. participated in a speaker’s bureau for Roche; received patents or royalties from EDO-Mundipharma; received honoraria from Roche, MSD, Bristol-Myers Squibb, and Servier; served on the advisory board of Servier, Roche, Bristol-Myers Squibb, and MSD; and received travel grants from Roche and Takeda. D.R. served on the advisory board of Boehringer Ingelheim and Eli Lilly, received travel grants from Asana, and received research funding from Celgene, A Bristol-Myers Squibb Company. C.P. participated in a speaker’s bureau for Roche and Janssen, served on the advisory board of Bristol-Myers Squibb and Kyowa Kirin, and received travel grants from Roche. J.A.L.-M. participated in a speaker’s bureau for Bristol-Myers Squibb, Roche, and MSD; received patents or royalties and reports equity ownership from PharmaMar; received travel grants from Bristol Myers-Squibb, Roche, and MSD; and received research funding from Iovance, Adaptimmune, Novartis, Roche, Merck, Pfizer, MSD, and Celgene, A Bristol-Myers Squibb Company. A. Santoro participated in a speaker’s bureau for Takeda, Roche, AbbVie, Amgen, Celgene, A Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, AstraZeneca, Eli Lilly, Sandoz, and Novartis and served on the advisory board for Bristol-Myers Squibb, Servier, Gilead, Pfizer, Eisai, Arqule, Bayer, and MSD. A. Salar participated in a speaker’s bureau for Roche and Janssen; received travel grants from Roche; served on the advisory board of Celgene, A Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Roche, Janssen, Gilead; and reports research funding from Roche and Gilead. S.D. reports research funding from Novartis. A.M. received honoraria from Celgene, A Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Roche, Janssen, and Servier; served on the advisory board of Roche, Celgene, A Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, and MorPhosys; provided expert testimony on behalf of Gilead; received travel grants from Roche, Celgene, A Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Janssen, Servier, and Mundipharma; and reports research funding from Celgene, A Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Janssen, Teva, and Mundipharma. A.W. received patents and royalties from BC Cancer Agency, received travel grants from Dava Oncology, served on the advisory board for m-panels and Guidepoint global, and reports research funding from Celgene, A Bristol-Myers Squibb Company. T.J.B. has equity ownership with Amgen. V.R. received honoraria from Infinity Pharmaceuticals, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eisai, PharmaMar, and Gilead Sciences; served on the advisory board for Infinity Pharmaceuticals, Bristol-Myers Squibb, PharmaMar, Gilead Sciences, NanoString Technologies, Incyte, MSD, Roche, Genentech, and Epizyme; provided expert testimony on behalf of Servier, reports research funding from arGEN-X BVBA; and received travel grants from Roche and Bristol-Myers Squibb. F.S. has equity ownership with Bristol-Myers Squibb. S. Couto had equity ownership with Celgne, A Bristol-Myers Squibb Company. M.G., S. Carrancio, X. Wei, K.H., M.W.B.T., A.R., M.W., T.J.B., P.R.H., A.K.G., and M.P. are employees of Bristol-Myers Squibb and have equity ownership with Bristol-Myers Squibb. R.B., G.V., E.V.d.N., and X. Wang declare no competing financial interests.

Figures

None
Graphical abstract
Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Avadomide effects on immune activation in peripheral blood. (A) Aiolos expression in peripheral CD19+ B and CD3+ T cells. (B) Ex vivo IFN-γ production in response to anti-CD3 stimulation. (C) Total peripheral blood CD8+ T cells and shifts in CD8+ T-cell subsets (naive, activated, memory). (D) TCR-β expression levels (log10-transformed number of CDR3 reads) at baseline vs on-treatment are plotted. Color indicates a significant differential expression (red, not significant; blue, significant; adjusted P < .001) or publicly identified TCR sequence with known antigen (green). Changes in TCR-β productive clonality and richness from baseline to end of cycle 2 are shown for each patient. Extent of change in percentage of baseline (0 indicating no change) is plotted.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Avadomide effects signaling pathways and immune cell infiltration in DLBCL tumors. (A) RNA sequencing with immune cell deconvolution performed on screening and on-treatment (C1D10/15) biopsy specimens, showing enrichment/depletion relative to screening biopsy. (B) Cellular composition in paired tumor biopsy specimens by immunohistochemistry. Original magnification, ×20. (C) Intratumoral cell counts in screening vs on-treatment biopsy specimens by immunohistochemistry (CD20+ B cells; CD3+ T cells; CD163+ macrophages; CD56+ NK cells). DAPI, 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Best percentage reduction in target lesion burden over baseline in all response-evaluable patients. Dotted line indicates 50% reduction, consistent with a response (per investigator assessment, according to revised 2007 International Working Group [IWG] criteria). Blue, DLBCL de novo; red, transformed lymphoma.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Progression-free survival (PFS) in de novo R/R DLBCL. PFS by COO (A) and gene expression classifier status (B). PFS was assessed by investigators. Asterisks represent censored observations. N/A, not available.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Perry AM, Diebold J, Nathwani BN, et al. Non-Hodgkin lymphoma in the developing world: review of 4539 cases from the International Non-Hodgkin lymphoma classification project. Haematologica. 2016;101(10):1244-1250. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Teras LR, DeSantis CE, Cerhan JR, Morton LM, Jemal A, Flowers CR. 2016 US lymphoid malignancy statistics by World Health Organization subtypes. CA Cancer J Clin. 2016;66(6):443-459. - PubMed
    1. Sant M, Allemani C, Tereanu C, et al. ; HAEMACARE Working Group . Incidence of hematologic malignancies in Europe by morphologic subtype: results of the HAEMACARE project. Blood. 2010;116(19):3724-3734. - PubMed
    1. Camicia R, Winkler HC, Hassa PO. Novel drug targets for personalized precision medicine in relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: a comprehensive review. Mol Cancer. 2015;14(1):207. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Philip T, Guglielmi C, Hagenbeek A, et al. Autologous bone marrow transplantation as compared with salvage chemotherapy in relapses of chemotherapy-sensitive non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. N Engl J Med. 1995;333(23):1540-1545. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data