Melanoma Prognosis: Accuracy of the American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging Manual Eighth Edition
- PMID: 31977051
- PMCID: PMC7492758
- DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djaa008
Melanoma Prognosis: Accuracy of the American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging Manual Eighth Edition
Abstract
Background: The American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) maintains that the eighth edition of its Staging Manual (AJCC8) has improved accuracy compared with the seventh (AJCC7). However, there are concerns that implementation may disrupt analysis of active clinical trials for stage III patients. We used an independent cohort of melanoma patients to test the extent to which AJCC8 has improved prognostic accuracy compared with AJCC7.
Methods: We analyzed a cohort of 1315 prospectively enrolled patients. We assessed primary tumor and nodal classification of stage I-III patients using AJCC7 and AJCC8 to assign disease stages at diagnosis. We compared recurrence-free (RFS) and overall survival (OS) using Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank tests. We then compared concordance indices of discriminatory prognostic ability and area under the curve of 5-year survival to predict RFS and OS. All statistical tests were two-sided.
Results: Stage IIC patients continued to have worse outcomes than stage IIIA patients, with a 5-year RFS of 26.5% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 12.8% to 55.1%) vs 56.0% (95% CI = 37.0% to 84.7%) by AJCC8 (P = .002). For stage I, removing mitotic index as a T classification factor decreased its prognostic value, although not statistically significantly (RFS concordance index [C-index] = 0.63, 95% CI = 0.56 to 0.69; to 0.56, 95% CI = 0.49 to 0.63, P = .07; OS C-index = 0.48, 95% CI = 0.38 to 0.58; to 0.48, 95% CI = 0.41 to 0.56, P = .90). For stage II, prognostication remained constant (RFS C-index = 0.65, 95% CI = 0.57 to 0.72; OS C-index = 0.61, 95% CI = 0.50 to 0.72), and for stage III, AJCC8 yielded statistically significantly enhanced prognostication for RFS (C-index = 0.65, 95% CI = 0.60 to 0.70; to 0.70, 95% CI = 0.66 to 0.75, P = .01).
Conclusions: Compared with AJCC7, we demonstrate that AJCC8 enables more accurate prognosis for patients with stage III melanoma. Restaging a large cohort of patients can enhance the analysis of active clinical trials.
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.
Figures
Comment in
-
Staging for Melanoma - Toward a New Paradigm?J Natl Cancer Inst. 2020 Sep 1;112(9):873-874. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djaa009. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2020. PMID: 31977050 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
-
- American Joint Committee for Cancer Staging and End Results Reporting. Manual for Staging of Cancer. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Raven Publishers; 1977:131–136.
-
- American Joint Committee on Cancer. Manual for Staging of Cancer 2nd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Raven Publishers; 1983:117–122.
-
- American Joint Committee on Cancer. Manual for Staging of Cancer 3rd ed Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Raven Publishers; 1988:139–144.
-
- American Joint Committee on Cancer. Manual for Staging of Cancer 4th ed Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Raven Publishers; 1992:143–148.
-
- American Joint Committee on Cancer. Manual for Staging of Cancer 5th ed Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Raven Publishers; 1997:163–170.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
