Clinical Experience of Vibroplasty With Direct Coupling to the Oval Window Without Use of a Coupler
- PMID: 31977072
- DOI: 10.1002/lary.28514
Clinical Experience of Vibroplasty With Direct Coupling to the Oval Window Without Use of a Coupler
Abstract
Objectives/hypothesis: To investigate the efficacy of direct implantation of a Vibrant Soundbridge (VSB) implant in the oval window (OW) without the use of an OW coupler in patients with severe mixed hearing loss.
Study design: Retrospective chart review METHODS: A total of 62 patients underwent VSB implantation between July 2016 and December 2018 at Severance Hospital in Seoul, South Korea. Among them, eight patients (nine ears) with moderate-to-severe mixed hearing loss were implanted with a VSB directly in the OW. A floating mass transducer (FMT) was attached to the stapes footplate and covered with tragal cartilage. The outcomes were evaluated using pure-tone audiogram and speech audiogram preoperatively and postoperatively. Word recognition score (WRS; % correct) were measured at the most comfortable loudness (MCL) level to evaluate speech perception.
Results: All cases posed difficulty with round window vibroplasty during surgery, and eventually, an FMT was appropriately placed in the OW without a coupler. Preoperative and postoperative bone conduction thresholds were not different. VSB-aided threshold improved in terms of functional and effective gains. Interestingly, four cases showed improved air conduction thresholds without the use of a VSB. In addition, MCL level with a VSB was significantly lower than that with a hearing aid, and VSB-aided WRS improved over time.
Conclusions: Direct implantation of a VSB in the OW without the use of a coupler showed favorable hearing outcomes, and the OW vibroplasty was safe. Direct OW vibroplasty without a coupler is a reliable procedure and can be a good option for hearing rehabilitation in patients with severe mixed hearing loss.
Level of evidence: 4 Laryngoscope, 2020.
Keywords: Vibrant Soundbridge; hearing rehabilitation; oval window coupler; severe mixed hearing loss.
© 2020 The American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society, Inc.
References
BIBLIOGRAPHY
-
- Gluth MB, Friedman AB, Atcherson SR, Dornhoffer JL. Hearing aid tolerance after revision and obliteration of canal wall down mastoidectomy cavities. Otol Neurotol 2013;34:711-714.
-
- Deveze A, Rameh C, Puchol MS, Lafont B, Lavieille JP, Magnan J. Rehabilitation of canal wall down mastoidectomy using a titanium ear canal implant. Otol Neurotol 2010;31:220-224.
-
- Colletti V, Soli SD, Carner M, Colletti L. Treatment of mixed hearing losses via implantation of a vibratory transducer on the round window. Int J Audiol 2006;45:600-608.
-
- Baumgartner WD, Boheim K, Hagen R, et al. The vibrant soundbridge for conductive and mixed hearing losses: European multicenter study results. Adv Otorhinolaryngol 2010;69:38-50.
-
- Mancheno M, Aristegui M, Sanudo JR. Round and oval window anatomic variability: its implication for the vibroplasty technique. Otol Neurotol 2017;38:e50-e57.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials