In Response
- PMID: 31977361
- DOI: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000004658
In Response
Conflict of interest statement
Conflicts of Interest: S. J. Brull has intellectual property assigned to Mayo Clinic (Rochester, MN); has received research funding from Merck & Co, Inc (funds to Mayo Clinic) and is a consultant for Merck & Co, Inc (Kenilworth, NJ); is a principal and shareholder in Senzime AB (publ) (Uppsala, Sweden); and a member of the Scientific Advisory Boards for ClearLine MD (Woburn, MA), The Doctors Company (Napa, CA), and NMD Pharma (Aarhus, Denmark). The remaining authors do not declare any conflicts of interest.
Comment on
-
The Clinical Use of Cricoid Pressure: First, Do No Harm.Anesth Analg. 2021 Jan;132(1):261-267. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000004360. Anesth Analg. 2021. PMID: 31397697 Review.
-
Lack of Evidence for the Benefit of Cricoid Pressure.Anesth Analg. 2021 Feb 1;132(2):e22-e24. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000004657. Anesth Analg. 2021. PMID: 31977362 No abstract available.
References
-
- Priebe HJ. Lack of evidence for the benefit of cricoid pressure. Anesth Analg. 2021;132:e22–e24.
-
- Zdravkovic M, Rice MJ, Brull SJ. The clinical use of cricoid pressure: first, do no harm. Anesth Analg. 2021;132:261–267.
-
- Rohsbach C, Wirth S, Lenz K, Priebe H. Survey on the current management of rapid sequence induction in Germany. Minerva Anestesiol. 2013;79:716–726.
-
- Zdravkovic M, Berger-Estilita J, Sorbello M, Hagberg CA. An international survey about rapid sequence intubation of 10,003 anaesthetists and 16 airway experts. Anaesthesia. 2020;75:313–322.
-
- Priebe HJ. Cricoid pressure: effective measure or ritual? Anesthesiology. 2018;128:233–234.
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources