Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2020 Mar;45(3):187-194.
doi: 10.1097/RLU.0000000000002921.

Comparison of 18F-FDG PET/CT Criteria for the Prediction of Therapy Response and Clinical Outcome in Patients With Metastatic Melanoma Treated With Ipilimumab and PD-1 Inhibitors

Alessio Annovazzi  1 , Sabrina Vari  2 , Diana Giannarelli  3 , Rosella Pasqualoni  1 , Rosa Sciuto  1 , Silvia Carpano  4 , Francesco Cognetti  5 , Virginia Ferraresi  2
Affiliations
Comparative Study

Comparison of 18F-FDG PET/CT Criteria for the Prediction of Therapy Response and Clinical Outcome in Patients With Metastatic Melanoma Treated With Ipilimumab and PD-1 Inhibitors

Alessio Annovazzi et al. Clin Nucl Med. 2020 Mar.

Abstract

: Immunotherapy currently represents one of the most effective therapies in metastatic melanoma. However, its indirect antineoplastic activity through the immune system has raised relevant challenges for diagnostic imaging in the evaluation of the response to treatment.

Purpose: The aim of this retrospective study was to compare the diagnostic accuracy of different F-FDG PET/CT criteria to predict therapy response and clinical outcome in melanoma patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors.

Patients and methods: Fifty-seven patients with metastatic melanoma treated with ipilimumab (n = 25; group 1) or with PD-1 inhibitors (n = 32; group 2) who performed an F-FDG PET/CT scan before treatment (PET0) and 12 to 18 weeks later (PET1) were retrospectively evaluated. Response at PET1 was evaluated according to RECIST 1.1, EORTC, PERCIMT (PET Response Evaluation Criteria for Immunotherapy), and by percentage change of metabolic tumor volume (MTV) and total lesion glycolysis of up to 5 target lesions. Performance of each criterion at PET1 to predict clinical benefit at 6 months since starting immunotherapy was assessed and correlated to progression-free survival.

Results: In group 1, the best predictor of therapy response was MTV combined with PERCIMT criteria (accuracy, 0.96). In group 2, overlapping results were found for EORTC, MTV, and total lesion glycolysis (accuracy, 0.97). The reliability of the above parameters was also confirmed in the progression-free survival analysis.

Conclusions: F-FDG PET/CT performed after 3 to 4 months since starting immunotherapy can correctly evaluate response to treatment and can also able to predict long-term clinical outcome. Performance of F-FDG PET/CT and criteria for response assessment is influenced by the class of treatment.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Luke JJ, Flaherty KT, Ribas A, et al. Targeted agents and immunotherapies: optimizing outcomes in melanoma. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2017;14:463–482.
    1. Wolchok JD, Chiarion-Sileni V, Gonzalez R, et al. Overall survival with combined nivolumab and ipilimumab in advanced melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2017;377:1345–1356.
    1. Schadendorf D, Long GV, Stroiakovski D, et al. Three-year pooled analysis of factors associated with clinical outcomes across dabrafenib and trametinib combination therapy phase 3 randomised trials. Eur J Cancer. 2017;82:45–55.
    1. Schachter J, Ribas A, Long GV, et al. Pembrolizumab versus ipilimumab for advanced melanoma: final overall survival results of a multicentre, randomised, open-label phase 3 study (KEYNOTE-006). Lancet. 2017;390:1853–1862.
    1. Saenger YM, Wolchok JD. The heterogeneity of the kinetics of response to ipilimumab in metastatic melanoma: patient cases. Cancer Immun. 2008;8:1.

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources