Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2020 Mar 18;102(6):477-485.
doi: 10.2106/JBJS.19.01071.

Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty Is Superior to Plate Fixation at 2 Years for Displaced Proximal Humeral Fractures in the Elderly: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial

Alexander Nilsskog Fraser  1   2 , Jonas Bjørdal  3 , Tone Mehlum Wagle  1 , Anna Cecilia Karlberg  1 , Odd Arve Lien  4 , Lars Eilertsen  2 , Konrad Mader  5 , Hilde Apold  6 , Leif Børge Larsen  7 , Jan Erik Madsen  1   8 , Tore Fjalestad  1
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty Is Superior to Plate Fixation at 2 Years for Displaced Proximal Humeral Fractures in the Elderly: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial

Alexander Nilsskog Fraser et al. J Bone Joint Surg Am. .

Erratum in

Abstract

Background: Almost one-third of patients with proximal humeral fractures are treated surgically, and the number is increasing. When surgical treatment is chosen, there is sparse evidence on the optimum method. The DelPhi (Delta prosthesis-PHILOS plate) trial is a clinical trial comparing 2 surgical treatments. Our hypothesis was that reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) yields better clinical results compared with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) using an angular stable plate.

Methods: The DelPhi trial is a randomized controlled trial comparing reverse TSA with ORIF for displaced proximal humeral fractures (OTA/AO types 11-B2 and 11-C2) in elderly patients (65 to 85 years of age). The primary outcome measure was the Constant score at a 2-year follow-up. The secondary outcome measures included the Oxford Shoulder Score and radiographic evaluation. Results were reported as the mean difference with 95% confidence interval (CI). The intention-to-treat principle was applied for crossover patients.

Results: There were 124 patients included in the study. At 2 years, the mean Constant score was 68.0 points (95% CI, 63.7 to 72.4 points) for the reverse TSA group compared with 54.6 points (95% CI, 48.5 to 60.7 points) for the ORIF group, resulting in a significant mean difference of 13.4 points (95% CI, 6.2 to 20.6 points; p < 0.001) in favor of reverse TSA. When stratified for fracture classification, the mean score was 69.3 points (95% CI, 63.9 to 74.7 points) for the reverse TSA group and 50.6 points (95% CI, 41.9 to 59.2 points) for the ORIF group for type-C2 fractures, which yielded a significant mean difference of 18.7 points (95% CI, 9.3 to 28.2 points; p < 0.001). In the type-B2 fracture group, the mean score was 66.2 points (95% CI, 58.6 to 73.8 points) for the reverse TSA group and 58.5 points (95% CI, 49.6 to 67.4 points) for the ORIF group, resulting in a nonsignificant mean difference of 7.6 points (95% CI, -3.8 to 19.1 points; p = 0.19).

Conclusions: At a 2-year follow-up, the data suggested an advantage of reverse TSA over ORIF in the treatment of displaced OTA/AO type-B2 and C2 proximal humeral fractures in elderly patients.

Level of evidence: Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
The flowchart of patients in the DelPhi study. There were 270 patients with OTA/AO type-B2 or C2 fractures in the age group of 65 to 85 years assessed for eligibility. In this study, 146 patients were excluded and 124 patients were included and were allocated to either reverse TSA or ORIF. Missing data due to patients withdrawing from the study or death are shown as the cumulative value at each time point. Some patients were not available for follow-up at certain time points but were included in the analysis if they were available for testing at other time points.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
The overall mean Constant score for the reverse TSA (RTSA) group and the ORIF group. The error bars indicate the 95% CIs. The Constant score ranges from 0 (worst) to 100 points (best) and consists of 4 dimensions of shoulder function: pain, activities of daily living, range of motion, and strength.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
The mean Constant score for the reverse TSA (RTSA) group and the ORIF group stratified by the OTA/AO fracture classification. The error bars indicate the 95% CIs.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
The mean Constant score for the reverse TSA (RTSA) group and the ORIF group stratified by age groups. The error bars indicate the 95% CIs.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
The overall mean Oxford Shoulder Score for the reverse TSA (RTSA) group and the ORIF group. The error bars indicate the 95% CIs. The Oxford Shoulder Score consists of 12 questions concerning shoulder pain, shoulder function, and activities of daily living and ranges from 0 points (worst) to 48 points (best).
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
The mean Oxford Shoulder Score for the reverse TSA (RTSA) group and the ORIF group stratified by the OTA/AO fracture classification. The error bars indicate the 95% CIs.
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
The mean Oxford Shoulder Score for the reverse TSA (RTSA) group and the ORIF group stratified by age groups. The error bars indicate the 95% CIs.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Court-Brown CM, Garg A, McQueen MM. The epidemiology of proximal humeral fractures. Acta Orthop Scand. 2001. August;72(4):365-71. - PubMed
    1. Fjalestad T, Hole MO, Jørgensen JJ, Strømsøe K, Kristiansen IS. Health and cost consequences of surgical versus conservative treatment for a comminuted proximal humeral fracture in elderly patients. Injury. 2010. June;41(6):599-605. Epub 2009 Nov 27. - PubMed
    1. Handoll H, Brealey S, Rangan A, Keding A, Corbacho B, Jefferson L, Chuang LH, Goodchild L, Hewitt C, Torgerson D. The ProFHER (PROximal Fracture of the Humerus: Evaluation by Randomisation) trial - a pragmatic multicentre randomised controlled trial evaluating the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of surgical compared with non-surgical treatment for proximal fracture of the humerus in adults. Health Technol Assess. 2015. March;19(24):1-280. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Han RJ, Sing DC, Feeley BT, Ma CB, Zhang AL. Proximal humerus fragility fractures: recent trends in nonoperative and operative treatment in the Medicare population. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2016. February;25(2):256-61. Epub 2015 Oct 2. - PubMed
    1. Fjalestad T, Hole MO, Hovden IA, Blücher J, Strømsøe K. Surgical treatment with an angular stable plate for complex displaced proximal humeral fractures in elderly patients: a randomized controlled trial. J Orthop Trauma. 2012. February;26(2):98-106. - PubMed

Publication types