Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Jan 24;15(1):e0226817.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0226817. eCollection 2020.

PCR for the detection of pathogens in neonatal early onset sepsis

Affiliations

PCR for the detection of pathogens in neonatal early onset sepsis

Clarissa Oeser et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Background: A large proportion of neonates are treated for presumed bacterial sepsis with broad spectrum antibiotics even though their blood cultures subsequently show no growth. This study aimed to investigate PCR-based methods to identify pathogens not detected by conventional culture.

Methods: Whole blood samples of 208 neonates with suspected early onset sepsis were tested using a panel of multiplexed bacterial PCRs targeting Streptococcus pneumoniae, Streptococcus agalactiae (GBS), Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus pyogenes (GAS), Enterobacteriaceae, Enterococcus faecalis, Enterococcus faecium, Ureaplasma parvum, Ureaplasma urealyticum, Mycoplasma hominis and Mycoplasma genitalium, a 16S rRNA gene broad-range PCR and a multiplexed PCR for Candida spp.

Results: Two-hundred and eight samples were processed. In five of those samples, organisms were detected by conventional culture; all of those were also identified by PCR. PCR detected bacteria in 91 (45%) of the 203 samples that did not show bacterial growth in culture. S. aureus, Enterobacteriaceae and S. pneumoniae were the most frequently detected pathogens. A higher bacterial load detected by PCR was correlated positively with the number of clinical signs at presentation.

Conclusion: Real-time PCR has the potential to be a valuable additional tool for the diagnosis of neonatal sepsis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Distribution of bacteria detected by specific bacterial PCR in 96 samples of neonates with suspected EOS.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Vergnano S, Menson E, Kennea N, Embleton N, Russell AB, Watts T, et al. Neonatal infections in England: the NeonIN surveillance network. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2011; 96(1): p. F9–F14. 10.1136/adc.2009.178798 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Stocker M, Fontana M, El Helou S, Wegscheider K, Berger TM. Use of procalcitonin-guided decision-making to shorten antibiotic therapy in suspected neonatal early-onset sepsis: prospective randomized intervention trial. Neonatology 2010; 97(2): p. 165–74. 10.1159/000241296 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Blackburn RM, Muller-Pebody B, Planche T, Johnson A, Hopkins S, Sharland M, et al. Neonatal sepsis—many blood samples, few positive cultures: implications for improving antibiotic prescribing. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2012; 97(6): p. F487–8. - PubMed
    1. Wirtschafter DD, Padilla G, Suh O, Wan K, Trupp D, Fayard EE. Antibiotic use for presumed neonatally acquired infections far exceeds that for central line-associated blood stream infections: an exploratory critique. J Perinatol. 2011; 31(8): p. 514–8. 10.1038/jp.2011.39 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Patel SJ, Saiman L. Principles and strategies of antimicrobial stewardship in the neonatal intensive care unit. Semin Perinatol. 2012; 36(6): p. 431–6. 10.1053/j.semperi.2012.06.005 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms