Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Jul;72(1):268-275.
doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2019.10.063. Epub 2020 Jan 21.

Rates and timing of subsequent amputation after initial minor amputation

Jonathan H Lin  1 , Sun Young Jeon  2 , Patrick S Romano  2 , Misty D Humphries  3
Affiliations

Rates and timing of subsequent amputation after initial minor amputation

Jonathan H Lin et al. J Vasc Surg. 2020 Jul.

Abstract

Objective: Studies evaluating major amputation after initial minor amputation are few with rates of subsequent major amputation ranging from 14% to 35% with limited understanding of associated comorbidities and time to limb loss. The aim of this study is to determine the major amputation rates for patients who had already undergone an initial minor amputation and determine which factors are associated with the need for subsequent major amputation.

Methods: Using statewide data between 2005 and 2013, patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD), diabetes mellitus (DM), and combined PAD/DM who had a lower extremity ulcer and who had also undergone a minor amputation were identified. These patients were evaluated for the rate of subsequent major amputation and competing risk Cox proportional hazards modeling was used to study which factors were associated with the risk of subsequent limb loss.

Results: The cohort consisted of 11,597 patients (DM, n = 4254; PAD, n = 2142; PAD/DM, n = 5201) with lower extremity ulcers who underwent an initial minor amputation. The rate of any subsequent amputation was highest in patients with PAD/DM (23% vs DM = 17%, PAD = 17%; P = not statistically significant). The rate of subsequent minor amputation was 16% in the PAD/DM versus 15.2% in PAD and 12.2% in patients with DM (P < .001). Patients with PAD/DM had the highest rate of subsequent major amputation (6.3% vs DM = 5.2%, PAD = 2.1%; P < .001). There was no statistically significant difference in the median time to major amputation among the three groups (PAD/DM, 13 months; DM, 14 months; PAD, 8.6 months; P = NS). Patients who were revascularized before a repeat minor amputation had a decreased risk of a major amputation compared with those who were intervened on after a repeat minor amputation (hazard ratio, 0.002; 95% confidence interval, 0-0.22). Patients treated completely in the outpatient setting were also less likely to undergo subsequent major amputation (hazard ratio, 0.7; 95% confidence interval, 0.5-0.98) compared with those who required hospitalization or presented to the emergency room.

Conclusions: Patients with ulcers and combined PAD and DM have a higher risk for secondary major and minor amputation than patients with either disease alone with half of the limb loss occurring at approximately 1 year after the initial minor amputation. Additionally, early diagnosis and appropriate referral may result in decreased limb loss for these patients.

Keywords: Amputation; Diabetes; Peripheral artery disease.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Flow diagram of cohort selection.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Kaplan-Meier Survival Curve illustrating mortality in the three disease groups. Adjusted for race, sex, payer status, and comorbidities.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Comment in

  • Effect of statin use on amputation rates.
    Paraskevas KI. Paraskevas KI. J Vasc Surg. 2021 Jan;73(1):354-355. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2020.07.099. J Vasc Surg. 2021. PMID: 33349390 No abstract available.
  • Reply.
    Lin JH, Humphries MD. Lin JH, et al. J Vasc Surg. 2021 Jan;73(1):355. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2020.08.026. J Vasc Surg. 2021. PMID: 33349392 No abstract available.

References

    1. Wukich DK, Raspovic KM, Suder NC. Patients With Diabetic Foot Disease Fear Major Lower-Extremity Amputation More Than Death. Foot & ankle specialist. 2018;11(1):17–21. - PubMed
    1. Suckow BD, Goodney PP, Cambria RA, Bertges DJ, Eldrup-Jorgensen J, Indes JE, et al. Predicting functional status following amputation after lower extremity bypass. Annals of vascular surgery. 2012;26(1):67–78. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Glaser JD, Bensley RP, Hurks R, Dahlberg S, Hamdan AD, Wyers MC, et al. Fate of the contralateral limb after lower extremity amputation. Journal of vascular surgery. 2013;58(6):1571–7.e1. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Griffin KJ, Rashid TS, Bailey MA, Bird SA, Bridge K, Scott JD. Toe amputation: a predictor of future limb loss? Journal of diabetes and its complications. 2012;26(3):251–4. - PubMed
    1. Johannesson A, Larsson GU, Ramstrand N, Turkiewicz A, Wirehn AB, Atroshi I. Incidence of lower-limb amputation in the diabetic and nondiabetic general population: a 10-year population-based cohort study of initial unilateral and contralateral amputations and reamputations. Diabetes care. 2009;32(2):275–80. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms