Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Oct;49(10):1581-1586.
doi: 10.1007/s13280-019-01312-9. Epub 2020 Jan 24.

Refining national greenhouse gas inventories

Affiliations

Refining national greenhouse gas inventories

Leehi Yona et al. Ambio. 2020 Oct.

Abstract

The importance of greenhouse gas inventories cannot be overstated: the process of producing inventories informs strategies that governments will use to meet emissions reduction targets. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) leads an effort to develop and refine internationally agreed upon methodologies for calculating and reporting greenhouse gas emissions and removals. We argue that these guidelines are not equipped to handle the task of developing national greenhouse gas inventories for most countries. Inventory guidelines are vital to implementing climate action, and we highlight opportunities to improve their timeliness and accuracy. Such reforms should provide the means to better understand and advance the progress countries are making toward their Paris commitments. Now is the time to consider challenges posed by the current process to develop the guidelines, and to avail the policy community of recent major advances in quantitative and expert synthesis to overhaul the process and thereby better equip multi-national efforts to limit climate change.

Keywords: Climate change; Forest soil carbon; Global carbon cycle; Greenhouse gas emissions inventories; Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change; United Nations Paris Agreement.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Aburas MM, Ahamad MSS, Omar NQ. Spatio-temporal simulation and prediction of land-use change using conventional and machine learning models: A review. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment. 2019 doi: 10.1007/s10661-019-7330-6. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bakker K, Ritts M. Smart Earth: A meta-review and implications for environmental governance. Global Environmental Change. 2018;52:201–211. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.07.011. - DOI
    1. Berthrong ST, Jobbágy EG, Jackson RB. A global meta-analysis of soil exchangeable cations, pH, carbon, and nitrogen with afforestation. Ecological Applications. 2009;19:2228–2241. doi: 10.1890/08-1730.1. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bustamante MMC, Roitman I, Aide TM, Alencar A, Anderson LO, Aragão L, Asner GP, Barlow J, et al. Toward an integrated monitoring framework to assess the effects of tropical forest degradation and recovery on carbon stocks and biodiversity. Global Change Biology. 2016;22:92–109. doi: 10.1111/gcb.13087. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Carraro C, Edenhofer O, Flachsland C, Kolstad C, Stavins R, Stowe R. The IPCC at a crossroads: Opportunities for reform. Science. 2015;350:34–35. doi: 10.1126/science.aac4419. - DOI - PubMed

Substances

LinkOut - more resources