Zirconia implants restored with single crowns or fixed dental prostheses: 5-year results of a prospective cohort investigation
- PMID: 31981374
- DOI: 10.1111/clr.13581
Zirconia implants restored with single crowns or fixed dental prostheses: 5-year results of a prospective cohort investigation
Abstract
Aim: To evaluate the clinical and radiological outcomes of one-piece zirconia implants restored with single crowns (SCs) or fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) over an observation period of 5 years in function.
Materials and methods: In a prospective cohort investigation with two investigational centers, one-piece zirconia implants were placed in anterior and posterior sites. After a healing period of at least 2 months in the mandible and 4 months in the maxilla with immediate provisional reconstructions, the final all-ceramic SCs or three-unit FDPs were cemented. Patients were followed for 5 years. Clinical parameters and radiological measurements of the implants and the neighboring teeth were assessed. For the statistical analysis, linear mixed models were applied.
Results: A total of 71 implants were placed in 60 patients. Sixty-three implants in 53 patients could be evaluated at the 5-year follow-up. Six patients with a total of seven implants were counted as dropouts. One implant did not achieve adequate osseointegration and had to be removed 5 weeks after implantation. The 5-year survival rate was calculated as 98.4% (95% CI 91.6, 99.9). The mean overall marginal bone loss from implant placement to the 5-year follow-up was 0.7 ± 0.6 mm. After an initial mean marginal loss before loading the implants (0.7 mm), no further statistically significant change in marginal bone level (p = .458) could be observed.
Conclusion: The investigated one-piece zirconia implant showed a high survival rate, very stable marginal bone, and mucosal margin levels after 5 years in function. Therefore, it can be considered safe and reliable for the reconstruction of implant-supported SCs or FDPs over a mid-term period.
Keywords: bone; ceramic; clinical; dental implants; human; osseointegration; zirconia.
© 2020 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Balmer, M., Spies, B. C., Vach, K., Kohal, R. J., Hammerle, C. H. F., & Jung, R. E. (2018). Three-year analysis of zirconia implants used for single-tooth replacement and three-unit fixed dental prostheses: A prospective multicenter study. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 29, 290-299. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.13115
-
- Borgonovo, A. E., Censi, R., Vavassori, V., Dolci, M., Calvo-Guirado, J. L., Delgado Ruiz, R. A., & Maiorana, C. (2013). Evaluation of the success criteria for zirconia dental implants: A four-year clinical and radiological study. International Journal of Dentistry, 2013, 463073. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/463073
-
- Bormann, K. H., Gellrich, N. C., Kniha, H., Dard, M., Wieland, M., & Gahlert, M. (2012). Biomechanical evaluation of a microstructured zirconia implant by a removal torque comparison with a standard Ti-SLA implant. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 23, 1210-1216. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02291.x
-
- Dekkers, O. M., Egger, M., Altman, D. G., & Vandenbroucke, J. P. (2012). Distinguishing case series from cohort studies. Annals of Internal Medicine, 156, 37-40. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-156-1-201201030-00006
-
- Fischer, J., Schott, A., & Martin, S. (2016). Surface micro-structuring of zirconia dental implants. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 27, 162-166. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12553
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
