Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2021 Mar;41(4):391-399.
doi: 10.1002/pd.5638. Epub 2021 Feb 21.

Outcome of fetal echogenic bowel: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Outcome of fetal echogenic bowel: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Alice D'Amico et al. Prenat Diagn. 2021 Mar.

Abstract

The main aim of this systematic review was to explore the outcome of fetuses with isolated echogenic bowel (EB) on antenatal ultrasound. Inclusion criteria were singleton pregnancies with isolated EB no associated major structural anomalies at the time of diagnosis. The outcomes observed were: chromosomal anomalies, cystic fibrosis (CF), associated structural anomalies detected only at follow-up scans and at birth, regression during pregnancy, congenital infections, intra-uterine (IUD), neonatal (NND) and perinatal (PND) death. Twenty-five studies (12 971 fetuses) were included. Chromosomal anomalies occurred in 3.3% of the fetuses, mainly Trisomy 21 and aneuploidies involving the sex chromosomes. Cystic fibrosis occurred in 2.2%. Congenital infections affected 2.2%, mainly congenital Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection. The majority of fetuses with EB experienced regression or disappearance of the EB at follow-up scans. Associated anomalies were detected at a follow-up scan in 1.8%. Associated anomalies were detected at birth and missed at ultrasound in 2.1% of cases. IUD occurred in 3.2% of cases while the corresponding figures for NND and PND were 0.4% and 3.1%. Fetuses with EB are at increased risk of adverse perinatal outcome, highlighting the need for a thorough antenatal management and postnatal follow-up. Assessment during pregnancy and after birth should be performed in order to look for signs of fetal aneuploidy, congenital infections and associated structural anomalies.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Hurt L , Wright M , Dunstan F , et al. Prevalence of defined ultrasound findings of unknown significance at the second trimester fetal anomaly scan and their association with adverse pregnancy outcomes: the Welsh study of mothers and babies population-based cohort. Prenat Diagn. 2016;36:40-48.
    1. Slotnick RN , Abuhamad AZ . Prognostic implications of fetal echogenic bowel. Lancet. 1996;347:85-87.
    1. Nyberg DA , Dubinsky T , Resta RG , Mahony BS , Hickok DE , Luthy DA . Echogenic fetal bowel during the second trimester: clinical importance. Radiology. 1993;188:527-531.
    1. Hill LM , Fries J , Hecker J , Grzybek P . Second-trimester echogenic small bowel: an increased risk for adverse perinatal outcome. Prenat Diagn. 1994;14:845-850.
    1. Cumpston M , Li T , Page MJ , Chandler J , et al. Updated guidance for trusted systematic reviews: a new edition of the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Oct 3;10:ED000142.

LinkOut - more resources