Nasopalatine canal and periapical radiolucency fusion following dentoalveolar trauma: A CBCT-based case-control study
- PMID: 31981439
- DOI: 10.1111/edt.12545
Nasopalatine canal and periapical radiolucency fusion following dentoalveolar trauma: A CBCT-based case-control study
Abstract
Background/aim: There is a lack of evidence regarding the radiological characteristics of a periapical radiolucency (PRL) fusion with the nasopalatine canal (NPC) following dentoalveolar trauma. The aim of this study was to assess the NPC enlargement resulting from fusion with a PRL and its relationship with the surrounding anatomical structures.
Material and methods: A total of 100 patients was retrospectively recruited and divided into two groups: case group and control group. The case group consisted of 50 cone-beam computed tomography scans of the maxilla of patients (32 males, 18 females; age range: 11-83 years) with a known history of dentoalveolar trauma in the maxillary anterior region and the presence of an undiagnosed and/or asymptomatic NPC and PRL fusion. An age- and gender-matched control group of 50 patients (32 males, 18 females; age range: 11-82 years) without trauma history to the upper anterior teeth, demonstrating normal maxillary scans, was recruited. A subjective scoring criterion was established for assessing the characteristics of the fused lesion and its relationship with the buccal/palatal alveolar cortex, nasal cavity cortex, NPC cortical border, and maxillary sinus floor.
Results: The fused NPC and PRL was mainly lobular in appearance (88%) with non-corticated well-defined margins (80%). Male patients showed larger (68%) dimensions compared with female patients (32%). The NPC cortical bone was the most commonly perforated structure in relation to fusion (72%), whereas maxillary sinus cortical bone was the least effected (2%). A statistically significant difference was observed between the NPC dimensions in the control and test groups, with fused lesions having larger mesiolateral, craniocaudal, and buccopalatal dimensions (P < .001).
Conclusions: Periapical radiolucencies should be treated as soon as possible before they fuse with NPC. In case of fusion, surgical enucleation should be considered as the treatment of choice.
Keywords: maxilla; nasopalatine canal; periapical lesion; tooth trauma.
© 2020 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Mraiwa N, Jacobs R, Van Cleynenbreugel J, Sanderink G, Schutyser F, Suetens P, et al. The nasopalatine canal revisited using 2D and 3D CT imaging. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2004;33:396-402.
-
- Bahşi İ, Orhan M, Kervancioglu P. A sample of morphological eponym confusion: foramina of Stenson/Stensen. Surg Radiol Anat. 2017;39:935-6.
-
- Suter VG, Jacobs R, Brücker MR, Furher A, Frank J, von Arx T, et al. Evaluation of a possible association between a history of dentoalveolar injury and the shape and size of the nasopalatine canal. Clin Oral Investig. 2016;20:553-61.
-
- Thakur AR, Burde K, Guttal K, Naikmasur VG. Anatomy and morphology of the nasopalatine canal using cone-beam computed tomography. Imaging Sci Dent. 2013;43:273-81.
-
- Gassner R, Tuli T, Hächl O, Moreira R, Ulmer H. Craniomaxillofacial trauma in children: a review of 3,385 cases with 6,060 injuries in 10 years. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2004;62:399-407.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources