Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Mar 5;77(5):970-984.e7.
doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2019.12.023. Epub 2020 Jan 22.

Cancer Cells Employ Nuclear Caspase-8 to Overcome the p53-Dependent G2/M Checkpoint through Cleavage of USP28

Affiliations

Cancer Cells Employ Nuclear Caspase-8 to Overcome the p53-Dependent G2/M Checkpoint through Cleavage of USP28

Ines Müller et al. Mol Cell. .

Abstract

Cytosolic caspase-8 is a mediator of death receptor signaling. While caspase-8 expression is lost in some tumors, it is increased in others, indicating a conditional pro-survival function of caspase-8 in cancer. Here, we show that tumor cells employ DNA-damage-induced nuclear caspase-8 to override the p53-dependent G2/M cell-cycle checkpoint. Caspase-8 is upregulated and localized to the nucleus in multiple human cancers, correlating with treatment resistance and poor clinical outcome. Depletion of caspase-8 causes G2/M arrest, stabilization of p53, and induction of p53-dependent intrinsic apoptosis in tumor cells. In the nucleus, caspase-8 cleaves and inactivates the ubiquitin-specific peptidase 28 (USP28), preventing USP28 from de-ubiquitinating and stabilizing wild-type p53. This results in de facto p53 protein loss, switching cell fate from apoptosis toward mitosis. In summary, our work identifies a non-canonical role of caspase-8 exploited by cancer cells to override the p53-dependent G2/M cell-cycle checkpoint.

Keywords: G2/M checkpoint; USP28; apoptosis; cancer; caspase-8; p53.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Interests The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Tumors with elevated and nuclear caspase-8 expression present with higher relapse rates and poor prognosis
(A) Caspase-8 gene expression was compared between human healthy and tumor samples derived from TCGA data base; ***p ≤ 0.001, **p ≤ 0.01, *p ≤ 0.05. (B) IHC analysis of caspase-8 localization in primary versus metastatic melanoma and in prostate benign and cancer tissue, respectively. Scale bar = 100 μm. (C) Quantification of caspase-8 expression level in TMAs of nevi (n=100) compared to melanoma (n=92); ***p ≤ 0.001. (D) Kaplan-Meier-Plot displaying survival rate of patients suffering from primary (n=91) melanoma with low or high caspase-8 expression level; *p ≤ 0,01. (E) Quantification of nuclear caspase-8 in TMAs of nevi (n=100), primary (n=92) and metastatic (n=48) melanoma. (F) Overall survival (days) of melanoma patients showing either nuclear (n=16) or cytosolic (n=27) staining of caspase-8; *p ≤ 0.05. (G) Ratio of caspase-8 expression derived from RNAseq analysis of patients with benign prostate phenotype (n=11), low (n=22) or high risk (n=47) prostate cancer, and NHT treated high risk prostate cancer (n=15); ***p ≤ 0.001, **p ≤ 0.005. (H) Kaplan-Meier-Plot displaying PSA recurrence free survival of Tax (n=19) or NHT (n=51) treated prostate cancer patients with low or high caspase-8 expression; *p ≤ 0,01. (I) Quantification of nuclear caspase-8 expression, in prostate cancer tissue cores of untreated (n=129/730) versus Tax-treated (n=59/107), castration resistant prostate cancer (CRPC/TURP, n=32/42) and neuroendocrine prostate cancer (NEPC, n=7/8) TMAs. (J) Quantification of nuclear caspase-8 in TMAs of untreated (n=16/47) compared to NHT treated for 1-6 months (n=15/26) and 7-12 months (n=37/43), respectively. See also Figure S1 and S2.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Nuclear expression of caspase-8 is mediated by distinct NES and NLS sequences
(A) Expression level of caspase-8 in primary melanocytes and different melanoma cell lines (WM115, WM35, MeWo, 451-LU, WM3211, A375) was determined by Western-blotting with GAPDH as loading control. (B) Caspase-8 was detected in cytosolic and nuclear fractions of WM115 cells by Western-blotting, compared to whole cell lysates with IκBα as a marker for cytosolic, and Histone H3 for nuclear fraction. (C) Based on a wild type myc-tagged caspase-8 expression plasmid (wtCasp-8) putative NES (Casp-8-mNES) and NLS (Casp-8-mNLS) sequences were mutated. A catalytically inactive (Casp-8-C360A) and a Death Effector Domain lacking mutant (Casp-8-ΔDED) were generated. (D) The localization of caspase-8 mutants was analyzed immune-cytochemically: anti-caspase-8 (green), anti-myc (orange), phalloidin (red), DAPI (blue). Percentage of cells (n=100) expressing mostly cytosolic (cyt) or nuclear (nuc) caspase-8 was scored. Scale bar = 20 μm. (E) Cells were stimulated with izTRAIL (100 ng/ml), irradiated with sublethal UVB (200 J/m2), or stimulated with Cispatin (Cis; 10 μM) and Temozolomide (TMZ; 2 mM), respectively, for 30 min and analyzed by immunofluorescence. Scale bar = 50 μm. (F) Cells were treated as in (E) for 1 h and the subcellular localization of cleaved caspase-8 aggregates analyzed by immunofluorescence (anti-caspase-8 or anti cleaved capsase-8 (green), DAPI (blue), phalloidin (red)). Quantification of nuclear and cytosolic cleaved caspase-8 aggregates is shown. Scale bar = 20 μm.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.. Caspase-8 knockdown induces intrinsic apoptosis in melanoma cells
(A) WM115 cells were silenced for caspase-8 with siRNA (siCasp-8) or a siRNA smart pool (spCasp-8) for 72 h and apoptosis determined by Cell Death Detection ELISA (CDDE). Caspase-8 knockdown was documented by Western-blotting with GAPDH as loading control. (B) Cells silenced for caspase-8 were irradiated with sub-lethal UVB (200 J/m2) and apoptosis assessed 24 h later using CDDE; **p ≤ 0.005. (C) Cells were treated with QVD (5 μM), Necrostatin-1S (Nec-1S, 15 μM) or both for 1 h prior to caspase-8 silencing. After 72 h apoptosis was determined by CDDE; **p ≤ 0.005. (D) Cells were silenced for caspase-8 alone or co-silenced for RIP1 and RIP3, respectively. After 72 h apoptosis was assessed by CDDE, and knockdown of RIP1, RIP3, and caspase-8 documented by Western-blotting with GAPDH as loading control. (E) Expression of proteins involved in intrinsic apoptosis (p53, p-p53-Ser15, Bax, Bak, Puma, Noxa, caspase-9, caspase-3, PARP) in untreated, siCasp-8 and mitotic (MSO) cells was documented by Western-blotting with α-tubulin as loading control. (F) Endogenous caspase-8 was silenced in cells stably expressing moTAP-tagged wtCasp-8 or mutCasp-8 (C360A) for 72 h and apoptosis determined by CDDE; **p ≤ 0.005. Expression of caspase-8 and p53 was determined by Western-blotting with GAPDH as loading control. (G) Caspase-8 was detected in cytosolic and nuclear fractions of WM115 cell clones 30 and 150, stably expressing preferably nuclear caspase-8 and clones 213 and 215 expressing preferably cytosolic caspase-8 by Western-blotting. IκBα served as a marker for cytosolic, Histone H3 for nuclear fractions. (H) The same clones as characterized in (G) were stimulated with cisplatin (10 μM) or temozolomide (2 mM). After 24 h apoptosis was assessed by CDDE; *p≤0.05; **p≤0.01; ***p≤0.005. Error bars are shown as mean ± SD. See also Figure S3.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.. Cancer cells with nuclear caspase-8 overcome cell cycle arrest at the G2/M checkpoint
(A) siCasp-8 WM115 cells were subjected to live cell imaging and dividing versus dying cells were quantified morphologically; **p ≤ 0.01. (B) FUCCI2-HeLa cells were transfected with siCasp-8 or siLacZ. After 24 h, cells were subjected to life cell imaging for 48 h. Percentage of green cells (S-G2-M) over time was determined by evaluating microscopic images (timeframe 10 min). (C) Scatter dot blot showing the duration of S-G2-M phase of control versus siCasp-8 cells (n=25); ***p≤ 0.001. (D) Number of cell deaths/hour of siCasp-8 transfected FUCCI2-HeLa in G1 (red), S-G2 (yellow), and G2/M (green) transition. (E) WM115 cells were subjected to LacZ or caspase-8 knockdown and synchronized in S-phase using a double thymidine block. 0 h, 6 h and 20 h after release cell cycle analysis was performed. Average percentages of cells in the particular cell cycle phase are given. (F) Expression of proteins involved in mitotic transition (caspase-8, p-H2AX-S139, Chk1, p-CHk1-S317, p-CHk1-S345, Cdk1, p-Cdk1-T161, p-Cdk1-T14, p-Cdk1-Y15, cdc25C, p-cdc25C-Ser216, p-cdc25C-T48, cyclin B1, p-cyclin B1-S147, p-H3-S10, PLK1) in untreated, siCasp-8 and mitotic (MSO) cells was documented by Western-blotting with α-tubulin as loading control. (G and H) HKF1_H2B-mCherry_αTubulin-mEGFP cells (G) silenced for caspase-8 or (H) treated with the caspase-8 inhibitor zIETD (20 μM) for 72 h were harvested via mitotic shake off (MSO). Chromatin structure and spindle formation were evaluated by image stream analysis. 500 cells were quantified. Scale bar = 7 μm. Error bars are shown as mean ± SD. See also Figure S4.
Figure 5.
Figure 5.. Caspase-8 regulates p53 stability at the G2/M checkpoint through cleavage of USP28
(A) Recombinant p53 was subjected to MDM2-mediated ubiquitination in vitro. De-ubiquitination of p53 by addition of recombinant USP28 (0.9 μM) was analyzed by immunoblotting. Addition of recombinant active caspase-8 (400 ng) resulted in cleavage and inactivation of USP28. (B) Expression of p53, USP28 and MDM2 in untreated, siCasp-8 and mitotic (MSO) WM115 cells was documented by Western-blotting with GAPDH as loading control. (C) Cells were treated with the proteasome inhibitor MG132 (10 μM), transfected with siCasp-8 or siUSP28. After 72 h recombinant USP28 (0.5 μM) was added to siUSP28 cell lysates. Level of p53 and K48-ubiquitin were analyzed in whole cell lysates by immunoblotting with β-actin as loading control. Ratio of p53 versus ubiquitin was calculated; *p ≤ 0.05; **p ≤ 0.005; ***p≤ 0.001. (D) Cells were treated with siCasp-8, siUSP28 or sip53. After 72 h TUBE-assay identifying the ubiquitination status of p53 was performed; *p ≤ 0.05. (E and F) Apoptosis of cells silenced for (E) USP28, Casp-8, or both, or (F) Casp-8, p53 or both was determined after 72 h by CDDE; ***p ≤ 0.001. Expression of caspase-8, USP28 and p53 was determined by Western-blotting with β-actin or GAPDH as loading controls. (G) Cells were synchronized in S-Phase with a double aphidicolin block. 5 h and 6 h after release cells were harvested and the status of cleaved caspase-8, USP28 and p53 determined by Western-blotting with β-actin as loading control. (H) Protein lysates of cells expressing recombinant wtUSP28, mutUSP28(D119E) or mutUSP28(D240E) were treated with recombinant Caspase-8 (400 ng). Cleavage of USP28 and caspase-8 was documented by Western-blotting with β-actin as loading control. (I) Apoptosis of cells expressing wtUSP28 or mutUSP28(D119E) was determined by CDDE 24 h after transfection; ***p ≤ 0.005. Status of USP28, p53 and ub-K48 was documented by Western-blotting with β-actin as loading control. (J) Caspase-8 was silenced in cells expressing wtUSP28 or mutUSP28(D119E). After 48 h apoptosis was assessed by CDDE; ***p ≤ 0.005. (K and L) Casp-8-mNES cell clone 30 stably expressing preferably nuclear caspase-8 and Casp-8-mNLS cell clone 213 expressing preferably cytosolic caspase-8 were transfected with wtUSP28 or mutUSP28(D119E), respectively, and stimulated with UVB (300 J/m2), cisplatin (10 μM) or Temozolomide (2 mM). (K) After 24 h apoptosis was assessed by CDDE; **p ≤ 0.01, and (L) the protein status of USP28 and p53 documented by Western-blotting with β-actin as loading control. Error bars are shown as mean ± SD. See also Figures S5 and S6.
Figure 6.
Figure 6.. Nuclear caspase-8 causes progression and survival of cancer cells harboring wild-type p53
(A) 17 different cancer cells lines (melanoma: WM115, 451-LU, A375, MeWo; prostate: PC3, DU145; breast: MCF-7, T47D; colon: HCT116, Colo-205; glioma: A172, T98G; pancreas: Panc89, liver: HepG3B, HUH-7, bladder: UM-UC-3, UC-1) expressing either wt or mut p53 were silenced for caspase-8. After 72 h apoptosis was assessed by CDDE. (B) p53 was stably knocked down using shRNA in cells stably expressing moTAP-tagged wtCasp-8 or mutCasp-8 (C360A), followed by single cell clone selection. The percentage of cell clones still expressing either wtCasp-8 (n=50) or mutCasp-8 (n=50) was quantified. (C) Examples of clones expressing different levels of caspase-8 and p53 was determined by immunoblotting with β-actin as loading control. (D) Apoptosis of clones 79 and 80 expressing lower endogenous p53 level was determined 72 h after caspase-8 knockdown by CDDE; ***p ≤ 0.001. Expression of caspase-8 and p53 was determined by immunoblotting with GAPDH as loading control. (E) Proliferation of clones 15, 17, 24 and 52 expressing different level of caspase-8 and p53, as indicated by immunoblotting (loading control: β-actin), was determined; ***p ≤ 0.001, **p ≤ 0.01, *p ≤ 0.05. (F) Cells were treated with the caspase-8 inhibitor zIETD and clonogenic outgrowth determined after 72 h by cristal violet staining; **p ≤ 0.01. (G) Caspase-8 was silenced in primary keratinocytes, fibroblasts and melanocytes, as well as in melanoma cells freshly isolated from patients metastases (M10, M20, M45). After 72 h apoptosis was determined by CDDE. The p53 mutation status in M10, M20 and M45 was assessed by sequence analysis. (H) Expression of caspase-8 and p53 in keratinocytes, fibroblasts, melanocytes, M10, M20 and M45 was determined by Western-blotting with GAPDH as loading control. (I) RNAseq data for Casp-8, the p53 mutation and survival status of patients as deduced from TCGA database were analyzed in a bioinformatics approach. Groups were split into high and low Casp-8 expression based on its median expression values. Percentages indicate the patient's vital status based on the Casp-8 expression and the corresponding p53 mutation status. Error bars are shown as mean ± SD. See also Figures S7.
Figure 7.
Figure 7.. Nuclear caspase-8 confers resistance to genotoxic stress in metastatic melanoma
(A) Localization of endogenous caspase-8 in cells isolated from melanoma metastases (M34, M51-1, M51-2, M54) was analyzed immunocytochemically: anti-caspase-8 (green), phalloidin (red), DAPI (blue). Percentage of cells (n=100) expressing mostly cytosolic (cyt) or nuclear (nuc) caspase-8 was scored. Scale bar = 50 μm. (B) Metastatic melanoma cells were treated with cisplatin (30 μM) for 24 h and apoptosis determined by CDDE; ***p ≤ 0.001. (C) The localization of endogenous caspase-8 in A375 cells was analyzed immunocytochemically as in (A). Parental cells (mock) and cells conditioned to cisplatin (cond cis., 1 μM) for 6 months were treated with lethal doses of cisplatin (30 μM) or UVB (400 J/m2). After 24 h apoptosis was assessed by CDDE; ***p ≤ 0.001. Status of Caspase-8, p53 and phospho-p53 was determined by Western-blotting with β-actin as loading control. Scale bar = 50 μm. Error bars are shown as mean ± SD.

References

    1. Allende-Vega N, Dayal S, Agarwala U, Sparks A, Bourdon JC, and Saville MK (2013). p53 is activated in response to disruption of the pre-mRNA splicing machinery. Oncogene 32, 1–14. - PubMed
    1. Barbero S, Mielgo A, Torres V, Teitz T, Shields DJ, Mikolon D, Bogyo M, Barila D, Lahti JM, Schlaepfer D, and Stupack DG (2009). Caspase-8 association with the focal adhesion complex promotes tumor cell migration and metastasis. Cancer Res. 69, 3755–3763. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Berglind H, Pawitan Y, Kato S, Ishioka C, and Soussi T (2008). Analysis of p53 mutation status in human cancer cell lines: a paradigm for cell line cross-contamination. Cancer Biol. Ther 7, 699–708. - PubMed
    1. Bieging KT, Mello SS, and Attardi LD (2014). Unravelling mechanisms of p53-mediated tumour suppression. Nat. Rev. Cancer 14, 359–370. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Boege Y, Malehmir M, Healy ME, Bettermann K, Lorentzen A, Vucur M, Ahuja AK, Bohm F, Mertens JC, Shimizu, et al. (2017). A Dual Role of Caspase-8 in Triggering and Sensing Proliferation-Associated DNA Damage, a Key Determinant of Liver Cancer Development. Cancer Cell 32, 342–359. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms