Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2020 Jun;133(6):741-749.
doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2019.12.025. Epub 2020 Jan 23.

Financial Incentives for Smoking Cessation in Hospitalized Patients: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Joseph A Ladapo  1 , Chi-Hong Tseng  2 , Scott E Sherman  3
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Financial Incentives for Smoking Cessation in Hospitalized Patients: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Joseph A Ladapo et al. Am J Med. 2020 Jun.

Abstract

Background: Financial incentives for smoking cessation and use of evidence-based therapy may increase quitting rates and reduce health and economic disparities.

Methods: We randomized a low-income population of 182 hospitalized patients (mean age 58 years, 45% with high school education or less) to enhanced usual care, which included hospital-directed cessation care and Quitline referral or enhanced usual care plus financial incentives. All patients received enhanced usual care, while participants randomized to the financial incentives group were also eligible to receive up to $550 for participation in Quitline counseling ($50), participation in a community-based cessation program ($50), use of pharmacotherapy ($50), and biochemically confirmed smoking cessation at 2 months ($150) and 6 months ($250). Primary outcome was biochemically confirmed smoking cessation at 6 months after hospital discharge.

Results: Total mean payment was $84 (standard deviation [SD] = $133) in the incentive group. The 6-month rate of biochemically confirmed smoking cessation was 19.6% in the incentive group and 8.9% in the enhanced usual care group (odds ratio [OR] 2.56; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.84 to 7.83, P = 0.10). Participants in the incentive group had higher rates of nicotine replacement therapy use (57.3% vs 31.3%, P = 0.002). Financial incentives did not improve subjective social status but did increase financial stress.

Conclusions: Rates of bioconfirmed smoking cessation were higher among hospitalized patients randomized to financial incentives compared to usual care alone, but the difference was not significant. Considering the frequency of low payouts and the importance of assistance for successful quitting, future studies should explore the effectiveness of financial incentives sufficiently large to overcome barriers to evidence-based therapy.

Keywords: FIESTA; Financial Incentives; Manhattan VA Hospital; Smoking cessation; Veterans.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests

N/A

Figures

Figure.
Figure.
Screening, Enrollment, and Follow-up of Study Participants
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. National Center for Chronic Disease P, Health Promotion Office on S, Health. The Health Consequences of Smoking—50 Years of Progress: A Report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta (GA): Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US); 2014.
    1. Jha P, Ramasundarahettige C, Landsman V, et al. 21st-century hazards of smoking and benefits of cessation in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2013;368(4):341–350. - PubMed
    1. Au DH, Bryson CL, Chien JW, et al. The effects of smoking cessation on the risk of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbations. J Gen Intern Med. 2009;24(4):457–463. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Critchley JA, Capewell S. Mortality risk reduction associated with smoking cessation in patients with coronary heart disease: a systematic review. JAMA. 2003;290(1):86–97. - PubMed
    1. Mills E, Eyawo O, Lockhart I, Kelly S, Wu P, Ebbert JO. Smoking cessation reduces postoperative complications: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Med. 2011;124(2):144–154 e148. - PubMed

Publication types