Socioeconomic deprivation increases the risk of disability in multiple sclerosis patients
- PMID: 31982665
- DOI: 10.1016/j.msard.2020.101930
Socioeconomic deprivation increases the risk of disability in multiple sclerosis patients
Abstract
Background: Little is known about the association between the socioeconomic status (SES) and disability risk of patients with Multiple Sclerosis (MS).
Objective: The aim of this study was to assess the influence of low SES, otherwise known as socioeconomic deprivation, on the disability risk of MS patients.
Methods: 4498 patients with a relapsing MS disease onset between 1982 and 2017 were included from the databases of three MS expert centres (Caen, Rouen, Lille) of the French Observatory for MS (OFSEP). Sociodemographic and clinical data of 3641 patients were used for the analysis. The EDI (European Deprivation Index), an ecological and composite indicator was used to assess the level of socioeconomic deprivation. Comparisons of time to reach EDSS 4 and EDSS 6, chosen as disability milestones, according to EDI quintiles were performed by Kaplan-Meier analysis. Cox proportional hazard models were also conducted to assess the risk according to EDI quintiles with adjustment to sex, MS type and age at disease onset.
Results: In the study population (n = 3641), most patients were women (71.9%; n = 2664). The mean age at disease onset was 32.2 years (SD =9.7). 1684 (46%) patients reached EDSS 4 and 1005 (28%) reached EDSS 6. The risk of reaching EDSS 4 and EDSS 6 in more socioeconomically deprived patients (EDI Q5) was independently higher than in the less socioeconomically deprived patients (EDI Q1) (HR=1.37 95%CI [1.15-1.64]) to reach EDSS 4 and (HR=1.42 95%CI [1.13-1.75]) to reach EDSS 6.
Conclusions: In this study, socioeconomic deprivation was significantly associated to the disability risk in MS patients. Better knowledge of socioeconomic disparities in MS may help adapt care to settings and improve the quality of care given to patients in the future.
Keywords: Disability progression; Epidemiology; Multiple sclerosis; Socioeconomic deprivation; Socioeconomic status.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of Conflicting Interests F. Calocer received a fellowship from the "Réseau Bas-Normand pour la SEP" and from the Regional Council of Normandy for carrying out this study and received a travel grant and from ECTRIMS Scientific Programme Committee and from ARSEP foundation for MS Research for presenting works. G. Defer received personal compensation for scientific advisory board from BiogenIdec, Novartis, Genzyme and Teva pharmaceutical Industries Ltd and has received funding for travel and/or speaker honoraria from Merck Serono, BiogenIdec, Novartis, Genzyme and Teva pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. His-institution received grants supporting research in his department from Merck Serono, BiogenIdec, Novartis and Genzyme. B. Bourre serves on scientific advisory board for Biogen, Merck Serono, Novartis Roche, Medday and has received funding for travel and honoraria from Biogen Idec, Merck Serono, Novartis, Sanofi-Genzyme, Roche and Teva. A. Kwiatkowski serves on scientific advisory board for Biogen, Merck Serono and Novartis and has received funding for travel and/or honoraria from Biogen, Merck Serono, Novartis, Sanofi-Genzyme, Roche and Teva P. Vermersch received honoraria and consulting fees from Biogen, Sanofi-Genzyme, Novartis, Teva, Merck, Roche, Servier, Celgene, Medday and Almirall and research supports from Biogen, Novartis, Sanofi-Genzyme, Roche and Merck, O. Dejardin, P.Hautecoeur, G.Launoy have nothing to disclose.
Comment in
-
Socioeconomic status and multiple sclerosis outcome.Nat Rev Neurol. 2020 Apr;16(4):191-192. doi: 10.1038/s41582-020-0329-3. Nat Rev Neurol. 2020. PMID: 32103186 No abstract available.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical