Individual and Population Benefits of Marine Reserves for Reef Sharks
- PMID: 31983638
- DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2019.12.005
Individual and Population Benefits of Marine Reserves for Reef Sharks
Abstract
No-take marine protected areas (MPAs) are a commonly applied tool to reduce human fishing impacts on marine and coastal ecosystems. However, conservation outcomes of MPAs for mobile and long-lived predators such as sharks are highly variable. Here, we use empirical animal tracking data from 459 individual sharks and baited remote underwater video surveys undertaken in 36 countries to construct an empirically supported individual-based model that estimates the conservation effectiveness of MPAs for five species of coral reef-associated sharks (Triaenodon obesus, Carcharhinus melanopterus, Carcharhinus amblyrhynchos, Carcharhinus perezi, and Ginglymostoma cirratum). We demonstrate how species-specific individual movement traits can contribute to fishing mortality of sharks found within MPAs as they move outside to adjacent fishing grounds. We discovered that the world's officially recorded coral reef-based managed areas (with a median width of 9.4 km) would need to be enforced as strict no-take MPAs and up to 5 times larger to expect protection of the majority of individuals of the five investigated reef shark species. The magnitude of this effect depended on local abundances and fishing pressure, with MPAs required to be 1.6-2.6 times larger to protect the same number of Atlantic and Caribbean species, which occur at lower abundances than similar species in the western Pacific. Furthermore, our model was used to quantify partially substantial reductions (>50%) in fishing mortality resulting from small increases in MPA size, allowing us to bridge a critical gap between traditional conservation planning and fisheries management. Overall, our results highlight the challenge of relying on abundance data alone to ensure that estimates of shark conservation impacts of MPAs follow the precautionary approach.
Keywords: MPAs; conservation planning; coral reefs; fisheries; management; marine protected areas; marine reserve network; movement; sharks; telemetry.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of Interests The authors declare no competing interests.
Comment in
-
Marine Conservation: Reef Sharks Need Bigger Protected Areas.Curr Biol. 2020 Feb 3;30(3):R117-R118. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2019.12.050. Curr Biol. 2020. PMID: 32017879
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous