State of clinical pain research in Nepal: a systematic scoping review
- PMID: 31984293
- PMCID: PMC6903326
- DOI: 10.1097/PR9.0000000000000788
State of clinical pain research in Nepal: a systematic scoping review
Abstract
Before determining the pain research priorities for a country, a comprehensive literature review of existing research is warranted. We aimed to (1) identify and describe the extent and nature of pain research performed in Nepal, (2) identify existing knowledge and significant knowledge gaps, and (3) provide recommendations for future studies. We conducted a systematic scoping review of the literature, in accordance with recommended guidelines. We searched local and international databases to identify research conducted in Nepal on individuals with a diagnosis of clinical pain conditions. A pair of independent reviewers screened the studies for inclusion. We identified 1396 records and included 116 studies. Most studies were published in Nepalese journals (75%) and were conducted in clinical settings (73%). Postsurgical pain was the most commonly studied pain condition (33%), followed by musculoskeletal pain (16%), headache (14%), and low back pain (13%). The most common research topics, in order of frequency, were (1) medical management (40%), (2) pain prevalence/incidence (21%), (3) diagnostic procedures (15%), (4) surgical management (8%), and (5) patient-reported outcome measurement (8%). Research gaps and potential areas of research waste were identified. Although a large number of research articles about pain in Nepal have been published, the majority of these have focused on the biomedical diagnosis and management of pain. Other topic areas (eg, psychological and social aspects of pain) are under-represented. The findings may inform future research directions for maximizing the knowledge that could be gained.
Keywords: Back pain; Chronic pain; Developing countries; Headache; Musculoskeletal pain; Nepal; Pain; Pain management; Postoperative pain.
Copyright © 2019 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The International Association for the Study of Pain.
Conflict of interest statement
Sponsorships or competing interests that may be relevant to content are disclosed at the end of this article.
Figures
References
-
- Acharya RS, Al-Oraibi S, Adhikari SP, Parajuli N, Limbu H, Enezi FA. Validation in the cross-cultural adaptation of the Nepali version of the oswestry disability index. Indian J Physiother Occup Ther 2014;8:158–63.
-
- Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2000;25:3186–91. - PubMed
-
- Bhattarai B, Pokhrel PK, Tripathi M, Rahman TR, Baral DD, Pande R, Bhattachaya A. Chronic pain and cost: an epidemiological study in the communities of Sunsari district of Nepal. Nepal Med Coll J 2007;9:6–11. - PubMed
-
- Chiarotto A, Boers M, Deyo RA, Buchbinder R, Corbin TP, Costa LOP, Foster NE, Grotle M, Koes BW, Kovacs FM, Lin CC, Maher CG, Pearson AM, Peul WC, Schoene ML, Turk DC, van Tulder MW, Terwee CB, Ostelo RW. Core outcome measurement instruments for clinical trials in nonspecific low back pain. PAIN 2018;159:481–95. - PMC - PubMed
-
- De Angelis CD, Drazen JM, Frizelle FA, Haug C, Hoey J, Horton R, Kotzin S, Laine C, Marusic A, Overbeke AJPJAoim. Is this clinical trial fully registered?: a statement from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. New England Journal of Medicine 2005;143:146–8. - PubMed
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources