Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2020 Mar;31(3):682-688.
doi: 10.1111/jce.14369. Epub 2020 Jan 31.

Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation reduces heart failure rehospitalization in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation reduces heart failure rehospitalization in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

Akira Fukui et al. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2020 Mar.

Abstract

Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is associated with heart failure (HF) rehospitalization in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF).

Objective: We tested the hypothesis that catheter ablation of AF could reduce HF rehospitalization compared with conventional pharmacotherapy in patients with HFpEF.

Methods: Eighty-five consecutive HFpEF (EF ≥ 50% and a history of HF hospitalization) patients diagnosed as AF by 12-lead electrocardiogram were retrospectively analyzed. Thirty-five patients who received catheter ablation (ABL group) were compared with 50 patients treated by antiarrhythmic drugs and/or beta-blockers (CNT group). The primary endpoint was rehospitalization due to HF.

Results: The patients characteristics did not differ between the two groups including, age (71 ± 8 vs 71 ± 13 years; P = .637), female sex (34% vs 36%; P = .870), mean plasma brain natriuretic peptide (145 ± 112 vs 195 ± 153 pg/mL; P = .111), mean left ventricular ejection fraction (62% ± 8% vs 61% ± 9%; P = .624), and type of AF (nonparoxysmal AF 60% vs 62%; P = .852). Amiodarone was continued 40% (14 out of 35) and 40% (20 out of 70) in ABL and CNT groups, respectively (P = 1.000). Neither major complication nor major side effect was observed during the follow-up period. During a mean follow-up period of 792 ± 485 days, Kaplan-Meier curve analysis showed that significantly more patients in the ABL group were free from HF rehospitalization (log-rank P = .0039). Additionally, multivariate analysis revealed that catheter ablation of AF was the only preventive factor of HF rehospitalization (OR = 0.15; 95% CI: 0.04-0.46; P < .001).

Conclusions: Catheter ablation of AF reduced HF rehospitalization compared with conventional pharmacotherapy in patients with HFpEF in our institute. Multicenter randomized study is warranted to confirm the result.

Keywords: ablation; antiarrhythmic durgs; atrial fibrillation; heart failure with preserved ejection fraction; rehospitalization.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

References

REFERENCES

    1. Owan TE, Hodge DO, Herges RM, Jacobsen SJ, Roger VL, Redfield MM. Trends in prevalence and outcome of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. N Engl J Med. 2006;355:251-259.
    1. Fonarow GC, Stough WG, Abraham WT, et al. Characteristics, treatments, and outcomes of patients with preserved systolic function hospitalized for heart failure: a report from the OPTIMIZE-HF Registry. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;50:768-777.
    1. Linssen GC, Rienstra M, Jaarsma T, et al. Clinical and prognostic effects of atrial fibrillation in heart failure patients with reduced and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction. Eur J Heart Fail. 2011;13:1111-1120.
    1. Sartipy U, Dahlström U, Fu M, Lund LH. Atrial fibrillation in heart failure with preserved, mid-range, and reduced ejection fraction. JACC Heart Fail. 2017;5:565-574.
    1. Zakeri R, Chamberlain AM, Roger VL, Redfield MM. Temporal relationship and prognostic significance of atrial fibrillation in heart failure patients with preserved ejection fraction: a community-based study. Circulation. 2013;128:1085-1093.

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances