A mixed-methods evaluation of stakeholder perspectives on pediatric pneumonia in Nigeria-priorities, challenges, and champions
- PMID: 31985139
- DOI: 10.1002/ppul.24607
A mixed-methods evaluation of stakeholder perspectives on pediatric pneumonia in Nigeria-priorities, challenges, and champions
Abstract
Background: Interventions to reduce pneumonia mortality exist; however, stakeholder engagement is needed to prioritize these. We explored diverse stakeholder opinions on current policy challenges and priorities for pediatric pneumonia in Nigeria.
Methods: We conducted a mixed-methods study, with a web-survey and semi-structured interviews, to explore stakeholder roles, policy barriers, opportunities, and priorities. Web-survey participants were identified through stakeholder mapping, including researchers' networks, academic and grey literature, and "Every Breath Counts" coalition membership. Stakeholders included actors involved in pediatric pneumonia in Nigeria from non-governmental, government, academic, civil society, private, and professional organizations. Stakeholder interviews were conducted with local government, healthcare managers, professional associations, and local leaders in Lagos and Jigawa states. Quantitative data were analyzed descriptively; qualitative data were analyzed using a thematic framework.
Results: Of 111 stakeholders, 38 (34%) participated in the web-survey and 18 stakeholder interviews were conducted. Four thematic areas emerged: current policy, systems barriers, intervention priorities, and champions. Interviewees reported a lack of pneumonia-specific policies, despite acknowledging guidelines had been adopted in their settings. Barriers to effective pneumonia management were seen at all levels of the system, from the community to healthcare to policy, with key issues of resourcing and infrastructure. Intervention priorities were the strengthening of community knowledge and improving case management, focused on primary care. While stakeholders identified several key actors for pediatric pneumonia, they also highlighted a lack of champions.
Conclusion: Consistent messages emerged to prioritize community and primary care initiatives, alongside improved access to oxygen, and pulse oximetry. There is a need for clear pneumonia policies, and support for adoption at a state level.
Keywords: Nigeria; child; pneumonia; political economy; stakeholder.
© 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
References
REFERENCES
-
- WHO Media Centre. Sixty-third World Health Assembly closes after passing multiple resoluations: The delegates at the World Health Assembly adopted resolutions on a variety of global health issues. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organisation; 2010. editor.
-
- Rudan I, El Arifeen S, Bhutta ZA, et al. Setting research priorities to reduce global mortality from childhood pneumonia by 2015. PLOS Medicine. 2011;8(9):e1001099.
-
- Brown R, Head M, on behalf of The Research Investments in Global health Study. Sizing up Pneumonia Research: assessing Global Investments in Pneumonia Research 2000-2015. Southampton: University of Southampton; 2018.
-
- Liu L, Oza S, Hogan D, et al. Global, regional, and national causes of under-5 mortality in 2000-15: an updated systematic analysis with implications for the sustainable development goals. The Lancet. 2016;388(10063):3027-3035.
-
- GBD 2017 Lower Respiratory Infections Collaborators. Quantifying risks and interventions that have affected the burden of lower respiratory infections among children younger than 5 years: an analysis for the global burden of disease study 2017. Lancet Infect Dis. 2019;393:2233-2260.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
