Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2020 May;158(6):1597-1610.e7.
doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2020.01.031. Epub 2020 Jan 25.

Synbiotics Alter Fecal Microbiomes, But Not Liver Fat or Fibrosis, in a Randomized Trial of Patients With Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Synbiotics Alter Fecal Microbiomes, But Not Liver Fat or Fibrosis, in a Randomized Trial of Patients With Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease

Eleonora Scorletti et al. Gastroenterology. 2020 May.

Abstract

Background & aims: Dysbiosis of the intestinal microbiota has been associated with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). We investigated whether administration of a synbiotic combination of probiotic and prebiotic agents affected liver fat content, biomarkers of liver fibrosis, and the composition of the fecal microbiome in patients with NAFLD.

Methods: We performed a double-blind phase 2 trial of 104 patients with NAFLD in the United Kingdom. Participants (mean age, 50.8 ± 12.6 years; 65% men; 37% with diabetes) were randomly assigned to groups given the synbiotic agents (fructo-oligosaccharides, 4 g twice per day, plus Bifidobacterium animalis subspecies lactis BB-12; n = 55) or placebo (n = 49) for 10-14 months. Liver fat content was measured at the start and end of the study by magnetic resonance spectroscopy, and liver fibrosis was determined from a validated biomarker scoring system and vibration-controlled transient elastography. Fecal samples were collected at the start and end of the study, the fecal microbiome were analyzed by 16S ribosomal DNA sequencing.

Results: Mean baseline and end-of-study magnetic resonance spectroscopy liver fat percentage values were 32.3% ± 24.8% and 28.5% ± 20.1% in the synbiotic group and 31.3% ± 22% and 25.2% ± 17.2% in the placebo group. In the unadjusted intention-to-treat analysis, we found no significant difference in liver fat reduction between groups (β = 2.8; 95% confidence interval, -2.2 to 7.8; P = .30). In a fully adjusted regression model (adjusted for baseline measurement of the outcome plus age, sex, weight difference, and baseline weight), only weight loss was associated with a significant decrease in liver fat (β = 2; 95% confidence interval, 1.5-2.6; P = .03). Fecal samples from patients who received the synbiotic had higher proportions of Bifidobacterium and Faecalibacterium species, and reductions in Oscillibacter and Alistipes species, compared with baseline; these changes were not observed in the placebo group. Changes in the composition of fecal microbiota were not associated with liver fat or markers of fibrosis.

Conclusions: In a randomized trial of patients with NAFLD, 1 year of administration of a synbiotic combination (probiotic and prebiotic) altered the fecal microbiome but did not reduce liver fat content or markers of liver fibrosis. (ClinicalTrials.gov, Number: NCT01680640).

Keywords: Cardiovascular Disease; INSYTE Study; Nutrition; Type 2 Diabetes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosures/Conflicts of interest: The synbiotic and placebo were provided at no cost by Chr. Hansen Holding A/S, Boege Alle 10-12, 2970 Hoersholm, Denmark. Chr. Hansen had no input into any aspect of study design or conduct of the trial. Furthermore, Chr. Hansen will have no input into data analysis or subsequent reporting of the trial results. PCC has received consulting fees from Chr. Hansen, but not in relation to this trial. None of the other authors has any disclosures.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Consort diagram
Figure 2
Figure 2. Synbiotics increase microbial beta-diversity.
(A) Principal coordinate analysis of the Morisita-Horn beta-diversity index computed based on the OTU table, for each group of patients, colored by time (baseline in red, end of study in blue) or patient ID. (B) Pairwise distance between baseline and end of study samples for each patient, computed using beta-diversity metrics. P-value of the Mann-Whitney test comparing placebo and synbiotics is presented below each graph.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Synbiotics boost Bifidobacterium and Faecalibacterium at the expense of Oscilibacter and Alistipes.
Genera presenting a significant difference in change of abundance over time between arms (q-value < 0.1). The bold line represents the mean changes.

References

    1. Chalasani N, et al. The diagnosis and management of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: practice guideline by the American Gastroenterological Association, American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases, and American College of Gastroenterology. Gastroenterology. 2012;142:1592–609. - PubMed
    1. Calzadilla Bertot L, Adams LA. The Natural Course of Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease. Int J Mol Sci. 2016;17 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Angulo P. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. N Engl J Med. 2002;346:1221–31. - PubMed
    1. Byrne CD. Fatty liver: role of inflammation and fatty acid nutrition. Prostaglandins Leukot Essent Fatty Acids. 2010;82:265–71. - PubMed
    1. Sherif ZA, et al. Global Epidemiology of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease and Perspectives on US Minority Populations. Dig Dis Sci. 2016;61:1214–25. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data