Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Apr;4(4):380-386.
doi: 10.1038/s41562-019-0815-z. Epub 2020 Jan 27.

A large-scale test of the link between intergroup contact and support for social change

Affiliations

A large-scale test of the link between intergroup contact and support for social change

Tabea Hässler et al. Nat Hum Behav. 2020 Apr.

Erratum in

  • Author Correction: A large-scale test of the link between intergroup contact and support for social change.
    Hässler T, Ullrich J, Bernardino M, Shnabel N, Laar CV, Valdenegro D, Sebben S, Tropp LR, Visintin EP, González R, Ditlmann RK, Abrams D, Selvanathan HP, Brankovic M, Wright S, von Zimmermann J, Pasek M, Aydin AL, Žeželj I, Pereira A, Lantos NA, Sainz M, Glenz A, Oberpfalzerová H, Bilewicz M, Kende A, Kuzawinska O, Otten S, Maloku E, Noor M, Gul P, Pistella J, Baiocco R, Jelic M, Osin E, Bareket O, Biruski DC, Cook JE, Dawood M, Droogendyk L, Loyo AH, Kelmendi K, Ugarte LM. Hässler T, et al. Nat Hum Behav. 2020 Jul;4(7):771. doi: 10.1038/s41562-020-0915-9. Nat Hum Behav. 2020. PMID: 32576984

Abstract

Guided by the early findings of social scientists, practitioners have long advocated for greater contact between groups to reduce prejudice and increase social cohesion. Recent work, however, suggests that intergroup contact can undermine support for social change towards greater equality, especially among disadvantaged group members. Using a large and heterogeneous dataset (12,997 individuals from 69 countries), we demonstrate that intergroup contact and support for social change towards greater equality are positively associated among members of advantaged groups (ethnic majorities and cis-heterosexuals) but negatively associated among disadvantaged groups (ethnic minorities and sexual and gender minorities). Specification-curve analysis revealed important variation in the size-and at times, direction-of correlations, depending on how contact and support for social change were measured. This allowed us to identify one type of support for change-willingness to work in solidarity- that is positively associated with intergroup contact among both advantaged and disadvantaged group members.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Allport, G. W. The Nature of Prejudice (Addison-Wesley, 1954).
    1. Schofield, J. W. School desegregation and intergroup relations: a review of the literature. Rev. Educ. Res. 17, 335–409 (1991).
    1. Lemmer, G. & Wagner, U. Can we really reduce ethnic prejudice outside the lab? A meta-analysis of direct and indirect contact interventions. Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. 4, 152–168 (2015). - DOI
    1. Pettigrew, T. F. & Tropp, L. R. A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 90, 751–783 (2006). - DOI
    1. Çakal, H., Hewstone, M., Schwär, G. & Heath, A. An investigation of the social identity model of collective action and the ‘sedative’ effect of intergroup contact among black and white students in South Africa. Br. J. Soc. Psychol. 50, 606–627 (2011). - DOI

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources