The Equivalence of Video Self-review Versus Debriefing After Simulation: Can Faculty Resources Be Reallocated?
- PMID: 31989069
- PMCID: PMC6965677
- DOI: 10.1002/aet2.10372
The Equivalence of Video Self-review Versus Debriefing After Simulation: Can Faculty Resources Be Reallocated?
Abstract
Introduction: Traditional simulation debriefing is both time- and resource-intensive. Shifting the degree of primary learning responsibility from the faculty to the learner through self-guided learning has received greater attention as a means of reducing this resource intensity. The aim of the study was to determine if video-assisted self-debriefing, as a form of self-guided learning, would have equivalent learning outcomes compared to standard debriefing.
Methods: This randomized cohort study consisting of 49 PGY-1 to -3 emergency medicine residents compared performance after video self-assessment utilizing an observer checklist versus standard debriefing for simulated emergency department procedural sedation (EDPS). The primary outcome measure was performance on the second EDPS scenario.
Results: Independent-samples t-test found that both control (standard debrief) and intervention (video self-assessment) groups demonstrated significantly increased scores on Scenario 2 (standard-t(40) = 2.20, p < 0.05; video-t(45) = 3.88, p < 0.05). There was a large and significant positive correlation between faculty and resident self-evaluation (r = 0.70, p < 0.05). There was no significant difference between faculty and residents self-assessment mean scores (t(24) = 1.90, p = 0.07).
Conclusions: Residents receiving feedback on their performance via video-assisted self-debriefing improved their performance in simulated EDPS to the same degree as with standard faculty debriefing. Video-assisted self-debriefing is a promising avenue for leveraging the benefits of simulation-based training with reduced resource requirements.
© 2019 by the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.
Figures
References
-
- Accreditation for Graduate Medical Education . The Emergency Medicine Milestone Project. Available at: http://www.acgme.org/Portals/0/PDFs/Milestones/EmergencyMedicineMileston.... Accessed July 25, 2017.
-
- Yan JW, McLeod SL, Iansavitchene A. Ketamine‐propofol versus propofol alone for procedural sedation in the emergency department: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Acad Emerg Med 2015;22:1003–13. - PubMed
-
- Malviya S, Voepel‐Lewis T, Tait AR. Adverse events and risk factors associated with the sedation of children by nonanesthesiologists. Anesth Analg 1997;85:1207–13. - PubMed
-
- Couloures KG, Beach M, Cravero JP, Monroe KK, Hertzog JH. Impact of provider specialty on pediatric procedural sedation complication rates. Pediatrics 2011;127:e1154–60. - PubMed
-
- Fanning RM, Gaba DM. The role of debriefing in simulation‐based learning. Simul Healthc 2007;2:115–25. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources