Recall and Outcome of Screen-detected Microcalcifications during 2 Decades of Mammography Screening in the Netherlands National Breast Screening Program
- PMID: 31990268
- DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2020191266
Recall and Outcome of Screen-detected Microcalcifications during 2 Decades of Mammography Screening in the Netherlands National Breast Screening Program
Abstract
Background Trends in the detection of suspicious microcalcifications at mammography screening and the yield of these lesions after recall are unknown. Purpose To determine trends in recall and outcome of screen-detected microcalcifications during 20 years of mammography screening. Materials and Methods The authors performed a retrospective analysis of a consecutive series of 817 656 screening examinations (January 1997 to January 2017) in a national breast screening program. In 2009-2010 (transition period), screen-film mammography (SFM) was gradually replaced by full-field digital mammography (FFDM). The recalls of suspicious microcalcifications from all radiology reports and pathologic outcome of recalled women with 2-year follow-up were analyzed. Screening outcome in the era of SFM (1997-2008), the transition period (2009-2010), and the era of FFDM (2011-2016) were compared. Trends over time and variations between the SFM and FFDM periods were expressed by using proportions with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). In cases where the analysis based on the CI confirmed clear periods (eg, before and after introduction of FFDM), pre- and postchange outcomes were compared by using χ2 tests. Results A total of 18 592 women (median age, 59 years; interquartile range, 14 years) were recalled at mammography screening, 3556 of whom had suspicious microcalcifications. The recall rate for microcalcifications increased from 0.1% in 1997-1998 to 0.5% in 2015-2016 (P < .001). This was temporally associated with the change from SFM to FFDM. The recalls yielding ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) increased from 0.3 per 1000 screening examinations with SFM to 1.1 per 1000 screening examinations with FFDM (P < .001), resulting in a decrease in the positive predictive value for recall for suspicious microcalcifications from 51% to 33% (P < .001). More than half of all DCIS lesions were high grade (52.6%; 393 of 747). The distribution of DCIS grades was stable during the 20-year screening period (P = .36). Conclusion The recall rate for suspicious microcalcifications at mammographic screening increased during the past 2 decades, whereas the ductal carcinoma in situ detection rate increased less rapidly, resulting in a lower positive predictive value for recall. © RSNA, 2020.
Similar articles
-
Screening outcome and surgical treatment during and after the transition from screen-film to digital screening mammography in the south of The Netherlands.Int J Cancer. 2015 Jul 1;137(1):135-43. doi: 10.1002/ijc.29354. Epub 2014 Dec 10. Int J Cancer. 2015. PMID: 25418512
-
Screening outcome in women repeatedly recalled for the same mammographic abnormality before, during and after the transition from screen-film to full-field digital screening mammography.Eur Radiol. 2017 Feb;27(2):553-561. doi: 10.1007/s00330-016-4399-y. Epub 2016 May 14. Eur Radiol. 2017. PMID: 27180183
-
Trends in incidence and tumour grade in screen-detected ductal carcinoma in situ and invasive breast cancer.Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2017 Nov;166(1):307-314. doi: 10.1007/s10549-017-4412-4. Epub 2017 Jul 26. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2017. PMID: 28748346
-
Impact of full field digital mammography on the classification and mammographic characteristics of interval breast cancers.Eur J Radiol. 2015 Jun;84(6):1056-61. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2015.03.007. Epub 2015 Mar 14. Eur J Radiol. 2015. PMID: 25816990 Review.
-
Systematic review and meta-analysis of prognostic characteristics for breast cancers in populations with digital vs film mammography indicate the transition may have increased both early detection and overdiagnosis.J Clin Epidemiol. 2024 Jul;171:111339. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2024.111339. Epub 2024 Apr 2. J Clin Epidemiol. 2024. PMID: 38570078
Cited by
-
The dilemma of recalling well-circumscribed masses in a screening population: A narrative literature review and exploration of Dutch screening practice.Breast. 2023 Jun;69:431-440. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2023.05.001. Epub 2023 May 3. Breast. 2023. PMID: 37169601 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Digital Mammography (DM) vs. Dynamic Contrast Enhancement-Magnetic Resonance Imaging (DCE-MRI) in Microcalcifications Assessment: A Radiological-Pathological Comparison.Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 May 21;14(11):1063. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14111063. Diagnostics (Basel). 2024. PMID: 38893590 Free PMC article.
-
Clinicopathological and prognostic value of calcification morphology descriptors in ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Insights Imaging. 2023 Dec 5;14(1):213. doi: 10.1186/s13244-023-01529-z. Insights Imaging. 2023. PMID: 38051355 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Contrast-Enhanced Spectral Mammography in the Evaluation of Breast Microcalcifications: Controversies and Diagnostic Management.Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Feb 9;11(4):511. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11040511. Healthcare (Basel). 2023. PMID: 36833045 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of a population-based breast cancer screening in North China.J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2023 Sep;149(12):10119-10130. doi: 10.1007/s00432-023-04905-w. Epub 2023 Jun 2. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2023. PMID: 37266660 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous