Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2020 Jan 28;323(4):329-338.
doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.21402.

Association of Isolated Diastolic Hypertension as Defined by the 2017 ACC/AHA Blood Pressure Guideline With Incident Cardiovascular Outcomes

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Association of Isolated Diastolic Hypertension as Defined by the 2017 ACC/AHA Blood Pressure Guideline With Incident Cardiovascular Outcomes

John W McEvoy et al. JAMA. .

Abstract

Importance: In the 2017 American College of Cardiology (ACC)/American Heart Association (AHA) guideline, the definition of hypertension was lowered from a blood pressure (BP) of greater than or equal to 140/90 to greater than or equal to 130/80 mm Hg. The new diastolic BP threshold of 80 mm Hg was recommended based on expert opinion and changes the definition of isolated diastolic hypertension (IDH).

Objective: To compare the prevalence of IDH in the United States, by 2017 ACC/AHA and 2003 Joint National Committee (JNC7) definitions, and to characterize cross-sectional and longitudinal associations of IDH with outcomes.

Design, setting, and participants: Cross-sectional analyses of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES 2013-2016) and longitudinal analyses of the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study (baseline 1990-1992, with follow-up through December 31, 2017). Longitudinal results were validated in 2 external cohorts: (1) the NHANES III (1988-1994) and NHANES 1999-2014 and (2) the Give Us a Clue to Cancer and Heart Disease (CLUE) II cohort (baseline 1989).

Exposures: IDH, by 2017 ACC/AHA (systolic BP <130 mm Hg, diastolic BP ≥80 mm Hg) and by JNC7 (systolic BP <140 mm Hg, diastolic BP ≥90 mm Hg) definitions.

Main outcomes and measures: Weighted estimates for prevalence of IDH in US adults and prevalence of US adults recommended BP pharmacotherapy by the 2017 ACC/AHA guideline based solely on the presence of IDH. Risk of incident atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), heart failure (HF), and chronic kidney disease (CKD) in the ARIC Study.

Results: The study population included 9590 adults from the NHANES (mean [SD] baseline age, 49.6 [17.6] years; 5016 women [52.3%]) and 8703 adults from the ARIC Study (mean [SD] baseline age, 56.0 [5.6] years; 4977 women [57.2%]). The estimated prevalence of IDH in the NHANES was 6.5% by the 2017 ACC/AHA definition and 1.3% by the JNC7 definition (absolute difference, 5.2% [95% CI, 4.7%-5.7%]). Among those newly classified as having IDH, an estimated 0.6% (95% CI, 0.5%-0.6%) also met the guideline threshold for antihypertensive therapy. Compared with normotensive ARIC participants, IDH by the 2017 ACC/AHA definition was not significantly associated with incident ASCVD (n = 1386 events; median follow-up, 25.2 years; hazard ratio [HR], 1.06 [95% CI, 0.89-1.26]), HF (n = 1396 events; HR, 0.91 [95% CI, 0.76-1.09]), or CKD (n = 2433 events; HR, 0.98 [95% CI, 0.65-1.11]). Results were also null for cardiovascular mortality in the 2 external cohorts (eg, HRs of IDH by the 2017 ACC/AHA definition were 1.17 [95% CI, 0.87-1.56] in the NHANES [n = 1012 events] and 1.02 [95% CI, 0.92-1.14] in CLUE II [n = 1497 events]).

Conclusions and relevance: In this analysis of US adults, the estimated prevalence of IDH was more common when defined by the 2017 ACC/AHA BP guideline compared with the JNC7 guideline. However, IDH was not significantly associated with increased risk for cardiovascular outcomes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Hoogeveen reported receiving grants and personal fees from Denka Seiken outside the submitted work. Dr Shah reported receiving grants from the National Institutes of Health during the conduct of the study and research support from Novartis through Brigham and Women’s Hospital and personal fees from Philip Ultrasound and Bellerophon outside the submitted work. Dr Ballantyne reported receiving consulting fees from AstraZeneca, Eli Lilly, Matinas BioPharma, Merck, Boehringer Ingelheim, Novo Nordisk, Denka Seiken, and Gilead and grant support (paid to his institution) and consulting fees from Amarin, Amgen, Esperion, Novartis, Regeneron, Sanofi-Synthelabo, and Akcea. Drs Ballantyne and Hoogeveen are co-investigators on a provisional patent filed by Roche for use of biomarkers in heart failure prediction. Dr Coresh reported receiving grants from the National Institutes of Health and National Kidney Foundation. No other disclosures were reported.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Cumulative Incidence of Cardiovascular Events in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study, According to Both 2003 Joint National Committee (JNC7) and 2017 American College of Cardiology (ACC)/American Heart Association (AHA) Definitions of Isolated Diastolic Hypertension (IDH)
A, The median follow-up in the sample testing the JNC7 definition was 25.1 years (interquartile range [IQR], 16.6-26.4) in the no IDH group and 25.1 years (IQR, 14.6-26.4) in the IDH group. B, The median follow-up in the sample testing the 2017 ACC/AHA definition was 25.2 years (IQR, 17.4-26.5) in the no IDH group and 25.4 years (IQR, 17.9-26.6) in the IDH group. ASCVD indicates atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Associations Between Isolated Diastolic Hypertension (IDH), by 2003 Joint National Committee (JNC7) and 2017 American College of Cardiology (ACC)/American Heart Association (AHA) Definitions, and Incident Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease (ASCVD) Events in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study
All comparisons are vs ARIC Study participants with normal blood pressure (BP) (when studying IDH by the JNC7 definition, this group consists of those with systolic BP <140 mm Hg and diastolic BP <90 mm Hg; when studying IDH by the 2017 ACC/AHA definition, this group consists of those with systolic BP <130 mm Hg and diastolic BP <80 mm Hg). Model 1 is adjusted for age, sex, race-center, and educational attainment. Model 2 is adjusted for model 1 plus smoking status, alcohol consumption, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, triglycerides, body mass index, antihypertensive medication, diabetes, and estimated glomerular filtration rate. Model 3 is adjusted for model 2 plus baseline systolic BP.

Comment in

References

    1. Whelton PK, Carey RM, Aronow WS, et al. . 2017 ACC/AHA/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/AGS/APhA/ASH/ASPC/NMA/PCNA guideline for the prevention, detection, evaluation, and management of high blood pressure in adults: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;71(19):2199-2269. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2017.11.005 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Williams B, Mancia G, Spiering W, et al. ; ESC Scientific Document Group . 2018 ESC/ESH guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension. Eur Heart J. 2018;39(33):3021-3104. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehy339 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chobanian AV, Bakris GL, Black HR, et al. ; Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; National High Blood Pressure Education Program Coordinating Committee . Seventh report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure. Hypertension. 2003;42(6):1206-1252. doi:10.1161/01.HYP.0000107251.49515.c2 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Franklin SS, Pio JR, Wong ND, et al. . Predictors of new-onset diastolic and systolic hypertension: the Framingham Heart Study. Circulation. 2005;111(9):1121-1127. doi:10.1161/01.CIR.0000157159.39889.EC - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fang J, Madhavan S, Cohen H, Alderman MH. Isolated diastolic hypertension: a favorable finding among young and middle-aged hypertensive subjects. Hypertension. 1995;26(3):377-382. doi:10.1161/01.HYP.26.3.377 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms