Practical Direct Immunofluorescence
- PMID: 31990699
- DOI: 10.1097/DAD.0000000000001516
Practical Direct Immunofluorescence
Abstract
Direct immunofluorescence (DIF) remains a valuable tool that may be underused because of perceived challenges in the interpretation, limitations, and processing of DIF specimens. The aim of this review is to provide a practical guide for appropriately incorporating DIF in a variety of clinical diseases, such as autoimmune blistering disorders. In vasculitis, the role of DIF continues to evolve, particularly in the setting of IgA vasculitis. Although typically not indicated for the workup of connective tissue disease, DIF may be helpful in cases with negative serologies, nondiagnostic histologic findings, or scarring alopecia. Practical pearls for biopsy technique, specimen handling, and storage are also discussed.
References
-
- Sinha AA, Sajda T. The evolving story of autoantibodies in pemphigus vulgaris: development of the “super compensation hypothesis.” Front Med (Lausanne). 2018;5:218.
-
- Zhou C, Yu Y, Elston DM. Diagnostic value of eccrine glands and hair follicles in direct immunofluorescent analysis of pemphigus vulgaris and bullous pemphigoid. J Cutan Pathol. 2016;43:334–338.
-
- Dmochowski M, Gornowicz-Porowska J, Bowszyc-Dmochowska M. Dew drops on spider web appearance: a newly named pattern of IgG4 deposition in pemphigus with direct immunofluorescence. Postepy Dermatol Alergol. 2017;34:295–298.
-
- Ko CJ, McNiff JM. Punctate pemphigus: an underreported direct immunofluorescence pattern. J Cutan Pathol. 2014;41:293–296.
-
- Buch AC, Kumar H, Panicker N, et al. A cross-sectional study of direct immunofluorescence in the diagnosis of immunobullous dermatoses. Indian J Dermatol. 2014;59:364–368.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
