Screening for vulnerable older people: Is the Probability of Repeated Admission scale an accurate tool?
- PMID: 31991044
- DOI: 10.1111/ggi.13867
Screening for vulnerable older people: Is the Probability of Repeated Admission scale an accurate tool?
Abstract
Aim: To evaluate the Probability of Repeated Admission (Pra) scale performance in predicting healthcare utilization and death in a community sample of Rio de Janeiro city, Brazil.
Methods: This was a prospective longitudinal study. The sample was composed of community-dwelling older people who participated in the research network Frailty in Brazilian Older People Study, Rio de Janeiro section. It analyzed data from the baseline and the follow up. At the baseline, 764 older adults were stratified by the Pra, and, 3 years later, data on health services utilization and survival status were collected. The Pra accuracy, obtained by the area under the curve, the sensitivity and the specificity to predict hospitalization in 3 years; visits to the emergency department; and death were determined. Cox regression estimated the survival curves, according to the risk strata.
Results: The accuracy, the sensitivity and the specificity of Pra were 62% (95% CI 57-68%), 8.8% and 95.4% for hospitalization in 3 years; 59% (95% CI 53-64%), 8.3% and 94.8% for emergency room visits; 66% (95% CI 59-74%) and 68% (95% CI 63-73%), 15.0% and 96.0% for death. Survival curves showed that high-risk individuals were more likely to die compared with the low-risk individuals, adjusted to covariables (P < 0.001).
Conclusions: The Pra presented low accuracy, low sensitivity and high specificity for all outcomes observed, indicating a poor performance to screen vulnerable older adults in Brazil. Therefore, this tool should not be used alone, as a case-finding instrument. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2020; 20: 360-365.
Keywords: frail older people; hospitalization; prospective studies; sensitivity and specificity.
© 2020 Japan Geriatrics Society.
References
-
- Bloom DE, Chatterji S, Kowal P et al. Macroeconomic implications of population ageing and selected policy responses. Lancet 2015; 385: 649-657. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(14)61464-1.
-
- Wouterse B, Huisman M, Meijboom BR, Deeg DJH, Polder JJ. The effect of trends in health and longevity on health services use by older adults. BMC Health Serv Res 2015; 15: 574. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-015-1239-8 PubMed PMID: 26704342; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4690430.
-
- Boult C, Pacala JT, Boult LB. Targeting elders for geriatric evaluation and management: reliability, validity, and practicality of a questionnaire. Aging 1995; 7: 159-164 Epub 1995/06/01. PubMed PMID: 8547369.
-
- Boult C, Pualwan TF, Fox PD, Pacala JT. Identification and assessment of high-risk seniors. HMO Workgroup on Care Management. Am J Manag Care 1998; 4: 1137-1146 PubMed PMID: 10182889.
-
- Veras RP. Experiências e tendências internacionais de modelos de cuidado para com o idoso. Cien Saude Colet 2012; 17: 231-238.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials