Response properties of cochlear efferent neurons: monaural vs. binaural stimulation and the effects of noise
- PMID: 3199181
- DOI: 10.1152/jn.1988.60.5.1779
Response properties of cochlear efferent neurons: monaural vs. binaural stimulation and the effects of noise
Abstract
1. Discharge properties of olivocochlear efferent neurons were measured in anesthetized cats. Previous studies of these neurons concentrated on monaural stimulation with tones and found sound-evoked discharge rates rarely exceeded 60 spikes/s (16, 20). In the present study, rates as high as 140 spikes/s were achieved by binaural stimulation and/or the addition of noise. Based on studies on the known effects of electrically stimulating the efferents such high rates of sound-evoked efferent activity probably have significant feedback effects on the auditory periphery. 2. Spontaneous discharge rate (SR) was weakly correlated with threshold among efferent neurons: those with SRs greater than 1 spikes/s were generally more sensitive than spontaneously inactive fibers. The discharge rate measured in the absence of acoustic stimulation was shown to be dependent on stimulation history: some units with zero SR became spontaneously active after several minutes of continuous noise stimulation. 3. For stimulation with monaural tones, efferent excitability varied with characteristic frequency (CF): units with CF less than 10 kHz tended to have lower thresholds, higher discharge rates, and shorter latencies than higher CF units. These differences could be minimized by the addition of broadband noise (see below). 4. When tones were presented to one ear at a time, most efferent units appeared monaural (91%), with roughly two-thirds excited by ipsilateral stimuli and one-third by contralateral stimuli. However, the effects of simultaneous stimulation of the two ears suggested that the great majority of efferent units have binaural inputs: the addition of opposite-ear noise or tones, which presented alone were not excitatory, typically enhanced the response to main-ear stimulation. This type of binaural facilitation was strongest among low-CF efferents when the opposite-ear stimuli were tones, and strongest among high-CF units when the opposite-ear stimulus was broadband noise. 5. The binaural facilitation seen using opposite-ear noise both lowered the threshold (by as much as 40 dB) and increased the discharge rate (by as much as 80%) to tones presented in the main ear. Significant facilitation was seen with noise levels as low as 25 dB SPL or tone levels as low as 30 dB SPL. In general, the weaker the response to monaural stimuli, the stronger the binaural facilitation. 6. The facilitatory effects of stimulation with continuous noise could outlast the stimulus. Persistent increases in efferent sensitivity were documented following 10-min exposures to broadband noise at 85-115 dB SPL.
Similar articles
-
Single olivocochlear neurons in the guinea pig. I. Binaural facilitation of responses to high-level noise.J Neurophysiol. 1998 Jun;79(6):3077-87. doi: 10.1152/jn.1998.79.6.3077. J Neurophysiol. 1998. PMID: 9636109
-
Single olivocochlear neurons in the guinea pig. II. Response plasticity due to noise conditioning.J Neurophysiol. 1998 Jun;79(6):3088-97. doi: 10.1152/jn.1998.79.6.3088. J Neurophysiol. 1998. PMID: 9636110
-
Physiology and anatomy of single olivocochlear neurons in the cat.Hear Res. 1986;24(1):17-36. doi: 10.1016/0378-5955(86)90003-1. Hear Res. 1986. PMID: 3759672
-
Protection from acoustic trauma is not a primary function of the medial olivocochlear efferent system.J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2003 Dec;4(4):445-65. doi: 10.1007/s10162-002-3013-y. Epub 2003 Jun 6. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2003. PMID: 12784134 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Absence of both auditory evoked potentials and auditory percepts dependent on timing cues.Brain. 1991 Jun;114 ( Pt 3):1157-80. doi: 10.1093/brain/114.3.1157. Brain. 1991. PMID: 2065245 Review.
Cited by
-
Contralateral effects and binaural interactions in dorsal cochlear nucleus.J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2005 Sep;6(3):280-96. doi: 10.1007/s10162-005-0008-5. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2005. PMID: 16075189 Free PMC article.
-
Reflex control of the human inner ear: a half-octave offset in medial efferent feedback that is consistent with an efferent role in the control of masking.J Neurophysiol. 2009 Mar;101(3):1394-406. doi: 10.1152/jn.90925.2008. Epub 2008 Dec 31. J Neurophysiol. 2009. PMID: 19118109 Free PMC article.
-
Distinct forms of synaptic plasticity during ascending vs descending control of medial olivocochlear efferent neurons.Elife. 2021 Jul 12;10:e66396. doi: 10.7554/eLife.66396. Elife. 2021. PMID: 34250904 Free PMC article.
-
Recording and labeling at a site along the cochlea shows alignment of medial olivocochlear and auditory nerve tonotopic mappings.J Neurophysiol. 2016 Mar;115(3):1644-53. doi: 10.1152/jn.00842.2015. Epub 2016 Jan 28. J Neurophysiol. 2016. PMID: 26823515 Free PMC article.
-
The relationship between MOC reflex and masked threshold.Hear Res. 2011 Dec;282(1-2):128-37. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2011.08.007. Epub 2011 Aug 26. Hear Res. 2011. PMID: 21878379 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous