Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Jan 21:26:100468.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2020.100468. eCollection 2020 Feb.

Brugada syndrome: A comprehensive review of pathophysiological mechanisms and risk stratification strategies

Affiliations
Review

Brugada syndrome: A comprehensive review of pathophysiological mechanisms and risk stratification strategies

Ka Hou Christien Li et al. Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. .

Erratum in

Abstract

Brugada syndrome (BrS) is an inherited ion channel channelopathy predisposing to ventricular arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death. Originally believed to be predominantly associated with mutations in SCN5A encoding for the cardiac sodium channel, mutations of 18 genes other than SCN5A have been implicated in the pathogenesis of BrS to date. Diagnosis is based on the presence of a spontaneous or drug-induced coved-type ST segment elevation. The predominant electrophysiological mechanism underlying BrS remains disputed, commonly revolving around the three main hypotheses based on abnormal repolarization, depolarization or current-load match. Evidence from computational modelling, pre-clinical and clinical studies illustrates that molecular abnormalities found in BrS lead to alterations in excitation wavelength (λ), which ultimately elevates arrhythmic risk. A major challenge for clinicians in managing this condition is the difficulty in predicting the subset of patients who will suffer from life-threatening ventricular arrhythmic events. Several repolarization risk markers have been used thus far, but these neglect the contributions of conduction abnormalities in the form of slowing and dispersion. Indices incorporating both repolarization and conduction based on the concept of λ have recently been proposed. These may have better predictive values than the existing markers. Current treatment options include pharmacological therapy to reduce the occurrence of arrhythmic events or to abort these episodes, and interventions such as implantable cardioverter-defibrillator insertion or radiofrequency ablation of abnormal arrhythmic substrate.

Keywords: Brugada syndrome; Depolarization; Ion channel; Repolarization; Risk stratification.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Type 1 (top) and type 2 (bottom) Brugada ECG patterns.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Summary of arrhythmogenic mechanisms underlying Brugada syndrome. Adapted from with permission.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Kobayashi T., Shintani U., Yamamoto T., Shida S., Isshiki N., Tanaka T. Familial occurrence of electrocardiographic abnormalities of the Brugada-type. Int. Med. 1996;35:637–640. - PubMed
    1. Yan G.X., Antzelevitch C. Cellular basis for the electrocardiographic J wave. Circulation. 1996;93:372–379. - PubMed
    1. Grant A.O. Cardiac Ion Channels. Circulation: Arrhythmia Electrophysiol. 2009;2:185–194. - PubMed
    1. Wilde A.A., Postema P.G., Di Diego J.M., Viskin S., Morita H., Fish J.M. The pathophysiological mechanism underlying Brugada syndrome: depolarization versus repolarization. J. Mol. Cell Cardiol. 2010;49:543–553. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tse G., Wong S.T., Tse V., Yeo J.M. Depolarization vs. repolarization: what is the mechanism of ventricular arrhythmogenesis underlying sodium channel haploinsufficiency in mouse hearts? Acta Physiol. (Oxf) 2016 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources