Risk stratification in children with cancer and febrile neutropenia: A national, prospective, multicentre validation of nine clinical decision rules
- PMID: 31993576
- PMCID: PMC6978200
- DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2019.11.013
Risk stratification in children with cancer and febrile neutropenia: A national, prospective, multicentre validation of nine clinical decision rules
Abstract
Background: Reduced intensity treatment of low-risk febrile neutropenia (FN) in children with cancer is safe and improves quality of life. Identifying children with low-risk FN using a validated risk stratification strategy is recommended. This study prospectively validated nine FN clinical decision rules (CDRs) designed to predict infection or adverse outcome.
Methods: Data were collected on consecutive FN episodes in this multicentre, prospective validation study. The reproducibility and discriminatory ability of each CDR in the validation cohort was compared to the derivation dataset and details of missed outcomes were reported.
Findings: There were 858 FN episodes in 462 patients from eight hospitals included. Bacteraemia occurred in 111 (12·9%) and a non-bacteraemia microbiological documented infection in 185 (21·6%). Eight CDRs exhibited reproducibility and sensitivity ranged from 64% to 96%. Rules that had >85% sensitivity in predicting outcomes classified few patients (<20%) as low risk. For three CDRs predicting a composite outcome of any bacterial or viral infection, the sensitivity and discriminatory ability improved for prediction of bacterial infection alone. Across all CDRs designed to be implemented at FN presentation, the sensitivity improved at day 2 assessment.
Interpretation: While reproducibility was observed in eight out of the nine CDRs, no rule perfectly differentiated between children with FN at high or low risk of infection. This is in keeping with other validation studies and highlights the need for additional safeguards against missed infections or adverse outcomes before implementation can be considered.
Keywords: Cancer; Children; Febrile neutropenia; Risk prediction.
© 2019 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
Conflict of interest statement
GMH reports grants from the Victorian Cancer Agency during the conduct of the study. FEB reports grants from The Royal Children's Hospital Foundation during the conduct of the study. RDAL reports grants from the NHMRC during the conduct of this study. KAT, MS, ZA and FM and RP have nothing to disclose.
References
-
- Herd F., Bate J., Chisholm J., Johnson E., Phillips B. Variation in practice remains in the UK management of pediatric febrile neutropenia. Arch Dis Child. 2016;101:410–411. - PubMed
-
- Haeusler G.M., Slavin M.A., Bryant P.A., Babl F.E., Mechinaud F., Thursky K.A. Management of fever and neutropenia in children with cancer: a survey of Australian and New Zealand practice. J Paediatr Child Health. 2018;54:761–769. - PubMed
-
- Lehrnbecher T, Robinson P, Fisher B, et al. Guideline for the management of fever and neutropenia in children with cancer and hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation recipients: 2017 update. J Clin Oncol 2017; 35:2082–94. - PubMed
-
- Morgan J.E., Cleminson J., Atkin K., Stewart L.A., Phillips R.S. Systematic review of reduced therapy regimens for children with low risk febrile neutropenia. Support Care Cancer. 2016;24:2651–2660. - PubMed
-
- Orme L., Babl F., Barnes C., Barnett P., Donath S., Ashley D. Outpatient versus inpatient IV antibiotic management for pediatric oncology patients with low risk febrile neutropenia: a randomised trial. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2014;61:1427–1433. - PubMed
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous