Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Nov 9;27(7):taaa010.
doi: 10.1093/jtm/taaa010.

Traveller exposures to animals: a GeoSentinel analysis

Collaborators, Affiliations

Traveller exposures to animals: a GeoSentinel analysis

Michael P Muehlenbein et al. J Travel Med. .

Abstract

Background: Human coexistence with other animals can result in both intentional and unintentional contact with a variety of mammalian and non-mammalian species. International travellers are at risk for such encounters; travellers risk injury, infection and possibly death from domestic and wild animal bites, scratches, licks and other exposures. The aim of the present analysis was to understand the diversity and distribution of animal-related exposures among international travellers.

Methods: Data from January 2007 through December 2018 from the GeoSentinel Surveillance Network were reviewed. Records were included if the exposure was non-migration travel with a diagnosis of an animal (dog, cat, monkey, snake or other) bite or other exposure (non-bite); records were excluded if the region of exposure was not ascertainable or if another, unrelated acute diagnosis was reported.

Results: A total of 6470 animal exposures (bite or non-bite) were included. The majority (71%) occurred in Asia. Travellers to 167 countries had at least one report of an animal bite or non-bite exposure. The majority (76%) involved dogs, monkeys and cats, although a wide range of wild and domestic species were involved. Almost two-thirds (62.6%) of 4395 travellers with information available did not report a pretravel consultation with a healthcare provider.

Conclusions: Minimizing bites and other animal exposures requires education (particularly during pretravel consultations) and behavioral modification. These should be supplemented by the use of pre-exposure rabies vaccination for travellers to high-risk countries (especially to those with limited access to rabies immunoglobulin), as well as encouragement of timely (in-country) post-exposure prophylaxis for rabies and Macacine alphaherpesvirus 1 (herpesvirus B) when warranted.

Keywords: Bite; consultation; herpesvirus B; post-exposure; pre-exposure; prophylaxis; rabies.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest: None declared.

References

    1. Abrahamian FM, Goldstein EJC. Microbiology of animal bite wound infections. Clin Microbiol Rev 2011; 24:231–46. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Shepherd SM, Mills A, Shoff WH. Human attacks by large felid carnivores in captivity and in the wild. Wilderness Environ Med 2014; 25:220–30. - PubMed
    1. Penteriani V, Lopez-Bao JV, Bettega C et al. Consequences of brown bear viewing tourism: a review. Biol Conserv 2017; 206:1691–80.
    1. Muehlenbein MP. Disease and human-animal interactions. Ann Rev Anthropol 2016; 45:395–416.
    1. Gautret P, Schwartz E, Shaw M et al. Animal-associated injuries and related diseases among returned travellers: a review of the GeoSentinel surveillance network. Vaccine 2007; 25:2656–63. - PubMed

Substances