Traveller exposures to animals: a GeoSentinel analysis
- PMID: 31993666
- PMCID: PMC7384971
- DOI: 10.1093/jtm/taaa010
Traveller exposures to animals: a GeoSentinel analysis
Abstract
Background: Human coexistence with other animals can result in both intentional and unintentional contact with a variety of mammalian and non-mammalian species. International travellers are at risk for such encounters; travellers risk injury, infection and possibly death from domestic and wild animal bites, scratches, licks and other exposures. The aim of the present analysis was to understand the diversity and distribution of animal-related exposures among international travellers.
Methods: Data from January 2007 through December 2018 from the GeoSentinel Surveillance Network were reviewed. Records were included if the exposure was non-migration travel with a diagnosis of an animal (dog, cat, monkey, snake or other) bite or other exposure (non-bite); records were excluded if the region of exposure was not ascertainable or if another, unrelated acute diagnosis was reported.
Results: A total of 6470 animal exposures (bite or non-bite) were included. The majority (71%) occurred in Asia. Travellers to 167 countries had at least one report of an animal bite or non-bite exposure. The majority (76%) involved dogs, monkeys and cats, although a wide range of wild and domestic species were involved. Almost two-thirds (62.6%) of 4395 travellers with information available did not report a pretravel consultation with a healthcare provider.
Conclusions: Minimizing bites and other animal exposures requires education (particularly during pretravel consultations) and behavioral modification. These should be supplemented by the use of pre-exposure rabies vaccination for travellers to high-risk countries (especially to those with limited access to rabies immunoglobulin), as well as encouragement of timely (in-country) post-exposure prophylaxis for rabies and Macacine alphaherpesvirus 1 (herpesvirus B) when warranted.
Keywords: Bite; consultation; herpesvirus B; post-exposure; pre-exposure; prophylaxis; rabies.
© International Society of Travel Medicine 2020. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.
Conflict of interest statement
References
-
- Shepherd SM, Mills A, Shoff WH. Human attacks by large felid carnivores in captivity and in the wild. Wilderness Environ Med 2014; 25:220–30. - PubMed
-
- Penteriani V, Lopez-Bao JV, Bettega C et al. Consequences of brown bear viewing tourism: a review. Biol Conserv 2017; 206:1691–80.
-
- Muehlenbein MP. Disease and human-animal interactions. Ann Rev Anthropol 2016; 45:395–416.
-
- Gautret P, Schwartz E, Shaw M et al. Animal-associated injuries and related diseases among returned travellers: a review of the GeoSentinel surveillance network. Vaccine 2007; 25:2656–63. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
