Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Jan 3;3(1):e1919928.
doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.19928.

Quantification of Neighborhood-Level Social Determinants of Health in the Continental United States

Affiliations

Quantification of Neighborhood-Level Social Determinants of Health in the Continental United States

Marynia Kolak et al. JAMA Netw Open. .

Abstract

Importance: An association between social and neighborhood characteristics and health outcomes has been reported but remains poorly understood owing to complex multidimensional factors that vary across geographic space.

Objectives: To quantify social determinants of health (SDOH) as multiple dimensions across the continental United States (the 48 contiguous states and the District of Columbia) at a small-area resolution and to examine the association of SDOH with premature mortality within Chicago, Illinois.

Design, setting, and participants: In this cross-sectional study, census tracts from the US Census Bureau from 2014 were used to develop multidimensional SDOH indices and a regional typology of the continental United States at a small-area level (n = 71 901 census tracts with approximately 312 million persons) using dimension reduction and clustering machine learning techniques (unsupervised algorithms used to reduce dimensions of multivariate data). The SDOH indices were used to estimate age-adjusted mortality rates in Chicago (n = 789 census tracts with approximately 7.5 million persons) with a spatial regression for the same period, while controlling for violent crime.

Main outcomes and measures: Fifteen variables, measured as a 5-year mean, were selected to characterize SDOH as small-area variations for demographic characteristics of vulnerable groups, economic status, social and neighborhood characteristics, and housing and transportation availability at the census-tract level. This SDOH data matrix was reduced to 4 indices reflecting advantage, isolation, opportunity, and mixed immigrant cohesion and accessibility, which were then clustered into 7 distinct multidimensional neighborhood typologies. The association between SDOH indices and premature mortality (defined as death before age 75 years) in Chicago was measured by years of potential life lost and aggregated to a 5-year mean. Data analyses were conducted between July 1, 2018, and August 30, 2019.

Results: Among the 71 901 census tracts examined across the continental United States, a median (interquartile range) of 27.2% (47.1%) of residents had minority status, 12.1% (7.5%) had disabilities, 22.9% (7.6%) were 18 years and younger, and 13.6% (8.1%) were 65 years and older. Among the 789 census tracts examined in Chicago, a median (interquartile range) of 80.4% (56.3%) of residents had minority status, 10.2% (8.2%) had disabilities, 23.2% (10.9%) were 18 years and younger, and 9.5% (7.1%) were 65 years and older. Four SDOH indices accounted for 71% of the variance across all census tracts in the continental United States in 2014. The SDOH neighborhood typology of extreme poverty, which is of greatest concern to health care practitioners and policy advocates, comprised only 9.6% of all census tracts across the continental United States but characterized small areas of known public health crises. An association was observed between all SDOH indices and age-adjusted premature mortality rates in Chicago (R2 = 0.63; P < .001), even after accounting for violent crime and spatial structures.

Conclusions and relevance: The modeling of SDOH as multivariate indices rather than as a singular deprivation index may better capture the complexity and spatial heterogeneity underlying SDOH. During a time of increased attention to SDOH, this analysis may provide actionable information for key stakeholders with respect to the focus of interventions.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: None reported.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Socioecological Model of Health and Social Determinants of Health Indices
Social determinants of health indicators are mapped onto different spheres of the socioecological model of health adapted from Bronfenbrenner. Principal components include indicators for each index. Blue shading indicates socioeconomic advantage index, purple shading indicates limited mobility index, red shading indicates urban core opportunity index, and yellow shading indicates mixed immigrant cohesion and accessibility index.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Social Determinants of Health Indices for Continental United States
A, Socioeconomic advantage index (PC1). B, Limited mobility index (PC2). C, Urban core opportunity index (PC3). D, Mixed immigrant cohesion and accessibility index (PC4). Index scores are provided for each interval, with total number of corresponding census tracts indicated in parentheses. Data classification corresponds to SDs, with brown shades indicating deviations below the mean and blue shades indicating deviations above the mean. PC1 indicates first primary component; PC2, second primary component; PC3, third primary component; and PC4, fourth primary component.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Braveman P, Egerter S, Williams DR. The social determinants of health: coming of age. Annu Rev Public Health. 2011;32(1):-. doi:10.1146/annurev-publhealth-031210-101218 - DOI - PubMed
    1. McGinnis JM, Williams-Russo P, Knickman JR. The case for more active policy attention to health promotion. Health Aff (Millwood). 2002;21(2):78-93. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.21.2.78 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Murray CJ, Atkinson C, Bhalla K, et al. ; US Burden of Disease Collaborators . The state of US health, 1990-2010: burden of diseases, injuries, and risk factors. JAMA. 2013;310(6):591-608. doi:10.1001/jama.2013.13805 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Adler NE, Cutler DM, Fielding JE, et al. . Addressing Social Determinants of Health and Health Disparities: A Vital Direction for Health and Health Care. NAM Perspectives Discussion Paper. Washington, DC: National Academy of Medicine; 2016.
    1. Garg A, Boynton-Jarrett R, Dworkin PH. Avoiding the unintended consequences of screening for social determinants of health. JAMA. 2016;316(8):813-814. doi:10.1001/jama.2016.9282 - DOI - PubMed