Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2020 Jan 29;8(1):5.
doi: 10.1186/s40359-020-0376-y.

The value of hope: development and validation of a contextual measure of hope among people living with HIV in urban Tanzania a mixed methods exploratory sequential study

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

The value of hope: development and validation of a contextual measure of hope among people living with HIV in urban Tanzania a mixed methods exploratory sequential study

Hellen Siril et al. BMC Psychol. .

Abstract

Background: Hope or hopefulness enhances coping and improves quality of life in persons with chronic or incurable illnesses. Lack of hope is associated with depression and anxiety, which impact negatively on quality of life. In Tanzania, where HIV prevalence is high, the rates of depression and anxiety are over four times higher among people living with HIV (PLH) compared to persons not infected and contribute annual mortality among PLH. Tanzania has a shortage of human resources for mental health, limiting access to mental health care. Evidence-based psychosocial interventions can complement existing services and improve access to quality mental health services in the midst of human resource shortages. Facilitating hope can be a critical element of non-pharmacological interventions which are underutilized, partly due to limited awareness and lack of hope measures, adapted to accommodate cultural context and perspectives of PLH. To address this gap, we developed and validated a local hope measure among PLH in Tanzania.

Methods: Two-phased mixed methods exploratory sequential study among PLH. Phase I was Hope-related items identification using deductive, inductive approaches and piloting. Phase II was an evaluation of psychometric properties at baseline and 24 months. Classical test theory, exploratory, confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) were used.

Results: Among 722 PLH, 59% were women, mean age was 39.3 years, and majority had primary school level of education. A total of 40 hope items were reduced to 10 in a three-factor solution, explaining 69% of variance at baseline, and 93% at follow-up. Internal consistency Cronbach's alpha was 0.869 at baseline and 0.958 at follow-up. The three-factor solution depicted: positive affect; cognition of effectiveness of HIV care; and goals/plans/ future optimism. Test-retest reliability was good (r = 0.797) and a number of indices were positive for CFA model fit, including Comparative Fit Index of 0.984.

Conclusion: The developed local hope scale had good internal reliability, validity, and its dimensionality was confirmed against expectations. The fewer items for hope assessment argue well for its use in busy clinical settings to improve HIV care in Tanzania. Hope in this setting could be more than cognitive goal thinking, pathway and motivation warranting more research.

Trial registration: The intervention was registered in USA ClinicalTrials.gov on September 26, 2012, Registration number: NCT01693458.

Keywords: Dar Es Salaam; HIV; Hope; NAMWEZA; PLH; Scale development; Validation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The author declared no potential competing of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow diagram summarizing the procedures used to develop the local hope scale
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Comparison of study Eigenvalues with simulated Eigenvalues Depicting 3 Factor Solutions during Pilot

References

    1. Snyder CR, Harris C, Anderson JR, Holleran SA, Irving LM, Sigmon ST, et al. The will and the ways: development and validation of an individual-differences measure of hope. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1991;60(4):570–585. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.60.4.570. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dictionaries EO . Definition of Hope in English. 2018.
    1. RKC J. Hope theory. In: Lopez S, Snyder CR, editors. Oxford handbook of positive psychology. 2. New York: Oxford, University Press; 2009. pp. 323–334.
    1. Ndolakia U. What's the difference between optimism and Hope. 2017.
    1. Lopez SJ. Making Hope happen create the future you want for yourself and others. New York: Atria Paperback, A Division of Simon & Schuster Inc; 2013.

Associated data