Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Jan 29;20(1):127.
doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-8225-8.

More Guidelines than states: variations in U.S. lead screening and management guidance and impacts on shareable CDS development

Jeremy J Michel  1   2   3 , Eileen Erinoff  4 , Amy Y Tsou  4   5
Affiliations

More Guidelines than states: variations in U.S. lead screening and management guidance and impacts on shareable CDS development

Jeremy J Michel et al. BMC Public Health. .

Abstract

Background: Pediatric lead exposure in the United States (U.S.) remains a preventable public health crisis. Shareable electronic clinical decision support (CDS) could improve lead screening and management. However, discrepancies between federal, state and local recommendations could present significant challenges for implementation.

Methods: We identified publically available guidance on lead screening and management. We extracted definitions for elevated lead and recommendations for screening, follow-up, reporting, and management. We compared thresholds and level of obligation for management actions. Finally, we assessed the feasibility of development of shareable CDS.

Results: We identified 54 guidance sources. States offered different definitions of elevated lead, and recommendations for screening, reporting, follow-up and management. Only 37 of 48 states providing guidance used the Center for Disease Control (CDC) definition for elevated lead. There were 17 distinct management actions. Guidance sources indicated an average of 5.5 management actions, but offered different criteria and levels of obligation for these actions. Despite differences, the recommendations were well-structured, actionable, and encodable, indicating shareable CDS is feasible.

Conclusion: Current variability across guidance poses challenges for clinicians. Developing shareable CDS is feasible and could improve pediatric lead screening and management. Shareable CDS would need to account for local variability in guidance.

Keywords: Clinical decision support; Geographic variation in care; Lead Screening; Lead poisoning.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

    1. Shah KK, Oleske JM, Gomez HF, et al. Blood Lead concentrations of children in the United States: a comparison of states using two very large databases. J Pediatr. 2017;185:218–223. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2017.01.059. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Benfer E. Contaminated childhood: the chronic Lead poisoning of low-income children and communities of color in the United States. Health Affairs Blog. 2017. 10.1377/hblog20170808.061398.
    1. Vorvolakos T, Arseniou S, Samakouri M. There is no safe threshold for lead exposure: Alpha literature review. Psychiatriki. 2016;27(3):204–214. doi: 10.22365/jpsych.2016.273.204. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Advisory Committee on Childhood Lead Poisoning Prevention. Low Level Lead Exposure Harms Children: A Renewed Call for Primary Prevention. Atlanta: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2012.
    1. Kennedy C, Yard E, Dignam T, et al. Blood Lead Levels Among Children Aged <6 Years - Flint, Michigan, 2013–2016. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2016;65(25):650–654. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6525e1. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms